Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

An

Leanne Reilly, Marc Mac Giolla Eain, Sarah Murphy, Andrew O'Sullivan, Mary Joyce, Ronan MacLoughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leanne Reilly *Research and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Ltd., Galway Business Park, Galway, Ireland.
Marc Mac Giolla Eain *Research and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Ltd., Galway Business Park, Galway, Ireland.
Sarah Murphy *Research and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Ltd., Galway Business Park, Galway, Ireland.
Andrew O'SullivanResearch and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Ltd., Galway Business Park, Galway, Ireland.
Mary JoyceResearch and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Ltd., Galway Business Park, Galway, Ireland.
Ronan MacLoughlinResearch and Development, Science and Emerging Technologies, Aerogen Ltd., Galway Business Park, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Aerosol therapy is often prescribed concurrently during invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). This study determines the effects of nebuliser position, circuit humidification source, and most importantly, lung health on the delivery of aerosol in simulated adult and paediatric IMV patients. Furthermore, the influence of closed suction catheters on aerosol delivery is also addressed. Methods: A vibrating mesh nebuliser was used to deliver Albuterol to simulated adult and paediatric IMV patients with differing states of lung health. Four different nebuliser positions and two types of humidification were analysed. Closed suction catheter mounts, a mainstay in IMV therapy, were incorporated into the circuits. The mean ± SD dose of aerosol (%) was assayed from a filter at the distal end of the endotracheal tube. Results: Nebuliser placement and circuit humidification source had no effect on the delivered dose (%) in adults, yet both significantly did in the simulated paediatric patients. The use of closed suction catheter mounts significantly reduced the delivered dose (%) in adults but not in paediatric patients. A simulated healthy lung state generated the largest delivered dose (%), irrespective of nebuliser position in the adult. However, different lung health and nebuliser positions yielded higher delivered doses (%) in paediatrics. Conclusion: Lung health and respiratory circuit composition significantly affect aerosol delivery in both adult and paediatric IMV patients. Nebuliser placement and respiratory circuit humidification source do not affect the delivered dose in adult but do in paediatric IMV patients.

Indexed as

adultaerosol drug deliverydrug administrationmechanical ventilationpaediatricsuction cathetervibrating mesh nebuliser

Identifiers

PMID38327274
PMCPMC10847248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.