Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38326875›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

IDHwt glioblastomas can be stratified by their transcriptional response to standard treatment, with implications for targeted therapy.

Georgette Tanner, Rhiannon Barrow, Shoaib Ajaib, Muna Al-Jabri, Nazia Ahmed, Steven Pollock, Martina Finetti, Nora Rippaus, Alexander F Bruns, Khaja Syed and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgette Tanner *Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Rhiannon Barrow *Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Shoaib AjaibLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Muna Al-JabriLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nazia AhmedLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Steven PollockLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Martina FinettiLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nora RippausLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alexander F BrunsLeeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Khaja SyedThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
James A PoulterLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Laura MatthewsLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Thomas HughesLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Erica WilsonLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Colin JohnsonLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Frederick S VarnThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Anke Brüning-RichardsonSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Catherine HoggLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alastair DroopWelcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Saffron Walden, UK.
Arief GusnantoSchool of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Matthew A CareLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Luisa CutilloSchool of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David R WestheadSchool of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Susan C ShortLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michael D JenkinsonThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew BrodbeltThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Aruna ChakrabartyLeeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Azzam IsmailLeeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Roel G W VerhaakThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Lucy F SteadLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. l.f.stead@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9550-4150
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBJackson Laboratory · USUniversity of Huddersfield · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBYale University · USYork St John University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T020504/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) brain tumors lacking IDH1 mutations (IDHwt) have the worst prognosis of all brain neoplasms. Patients receive surgery and chemoradiotherapy but tumors almost always fatally recur.

resultsUsing RNA sequencing data from 107 pairs of pre- and post-standard treatment locally recurrent IDHwt GBM tumors, we identify two responder subtypes based on longitudinal changes in gene expression. In two thirds of patients, a specific subset of genes is upregulated from primary to recurrence (Up responders), and in one third, the same genes are downregulated (Down responders), specifically in neoplastic cells. Characterization of the responder subtypes indicates subtype-specific adaptive treatment resistance mechanisms that are associated with distinct changes in the tumor microenvironment. In Up responders, recurrent tumors are enriched in quiescent proneural GBM stem cells and differentiated neoplastic cells, with increased interaction with the surrounding normal brain and neurotransmitter signaling, whereas Down responders commonly undergo mesenchymal transition. ChIP-sequencing data from longitudinal GBM tumors suggests that the observed transcriptional reprogramming could be driven by Polycomb-based chromatin remodeling rather than DNA methylation.

conclusionsWe show that the responder subtype is cancer-cell intrinsic, recapitulated in in vitro GBM cell models, and influenced by the presence of the tumor microenvironment. Stratifying GBM tumors by responder subtype may lead to more effective treatment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBrainDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38326875
PMCPMC10848526
OpenAlexW4391604158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.