Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38326860›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

The practical clinical role of machine learning models with different algorithms in predicting prostate cancer local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Chenhan Hu, Xiaomeng Qiao, Chunhong Hu, Changhao Cao, Ximing Wang, Jie Bao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chenhan HuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188#, Shizi Road, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Xiaomeng QiaoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188#, Shizi Road, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Chunhong HuDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188#, Shizi Road, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Changhao CaoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188#, Shizi Road, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Ximing WangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188#, Shizi Road, Suzhou, 215006, China. wangximing1998@163.com.
Jie BaoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188#, Shizi Road, Suzhou, 215006, China. baojie7346@suda.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-6793
Soochow University · CN

Funding

the Medical and Health Science and Technology Innovation Program in Suzhou SKY2022003the Special Program for Diagnosis and Treatment Technology of Clinical Key Diseases in Suzhou LCZX202001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection of local recurrence for prostate cancer (PCa) patients following radical prostatectomy (RP) is challenging and can influence the treatment plan. Our aim was to construct and verify machine learning models with three different algorithms based on post-operative mpMRI for predicting local recurrence of PCa after RP and explore their potential clinical value compared with the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) score of expert-level radiologists.

methodsA total of 176 patients were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into training (n = 123) and testing (n = 53) sets. The PI-RR assessments were performed by two expert-level radiologists with access to the operative histopathological and pre-surgical clinical results. The radiomics models to predict local recurrence were built by utilizing three different algorithms (i.e., support vector machine [SVM], linear discriminant analysis [LDA], and logistic regression-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LR-LASSO]). The combined model integrating radiomics features and PI-RR score was developed using the most effective classifier. The classification performances of the proposed models were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsThere were no significant differences between the training and testing sets concerning age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, T-stage, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), perineural invasion (PNI), and positive surgical margins (PSM). The radiomics model based on LR-LASSO exhibited superior performance than other radiomics models, with an AUC of 0.858 in the testing set; the PI-RR yielded an AUC of 0.833, and there was no significant difference between the best radiomics model and the PI-RR score. The combined model achieved the best predictive performance with an AUC of 0.924, and a significant difference was observed between the combined model and PI-RR score.

conclusionsOur radiomics model is an effective tool to predict PCa local recurrence after RP. By integrating radiomics features with the PI-RR score, our combined model exhibited significantly better predictive performance of local recurrence than expert-level radiologists' PI-RR assessment.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesSeminal VesiclesLocal recurrenceMachine learningMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstate CancerRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38326860
PMCPMC10848341
OpenAlexW4391630566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.