ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024
An early screening model for preeclampsia: utilizing zero-cost maternal predictors exclusively.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning for predictive risk stratification in recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning Prediction Models for Preeclampsia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- First-Trimester Prediction Models Based on Maternal Characteristics for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Pooled it
- Eclampsia risk prediction across diverse U.S. populations using CDC data: machine learning versus ACOG checklists.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Construction and comparison of preeclampsia prediction models using logistic regression and machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- An analytical pipeline for dose-response effect: laboratory tests assessment and early pregnancy preeclampsia risk.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Advancing preeclampsia prediction: a tailored machine learning pipeline integrating resampling and ensemble models for handling imbalanced medical data.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To provide a reliable, low-cost screening model for preeclampsia, this study developed an early screening model in a retrospective cohort (25,709 pregnancies) and validated in a validation cohort (1760 pregnancies). A data augmentation method (α-inverse weighted-GMM + RUS) was applied to a retrospective cohort before 10 machine learning models were simultaneously trained on augmented data, and the optimal model was chosen via sensitivity (at a false positive rate of 10%). The AdaBoost model, utilizing 16 predictors, was chosen as the final model, achieving a performance beyond acceptable with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 0.8008 and sensitivity of 0.5190. All predictors were derived from clinical characteristics, some of which were previously unreported (such as nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and menstrual cycle irregularity). Compared to previous studies, our model demonstrated superior performance, exhibiting at least a 50% improvement in sensitivity over checklist-based approaches, and a minimum of 28% increase over multivariable models that solely utilized maternal predictors. We validated an effective approach for preeclampsia early screening incorporating zero-cost predictors, which demonstrates superior performance in comparison to similar studies. We believe the application of the approach in combination with high performance approaches could substantially increase screening participation rate among pregnancies. Machine learning model for early preeclampsia screening, using 16 zero-cost predictors derived from clinical characteristics, was built on a 10-year Chinese cohort. The model outperforms similar research by at least 28%; validated on an independent cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.