ArticleScientific reports2024
Clinical and molecular study of radiation-induced gliomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- M-PACT leverages cell-free DNA methylomes to achieve robust classification of pediatric brain tumors.Nature cancer · 2026Article
- Capmatinib targeted therapy in MET-fusion driven radiation induced glioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Coexistence of histologically distinct intracranial tumors: Case series, literature review, and meta-analysis.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery in pediatric and young adult patients with high-grade brain tumors: Results from a European survey.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Favorable Response to Conventional Chemoradiotherapy in Radiation-induced Glioma Harboring Coamplification of PDGFRA, KIT, and KDR: A Case Report and Literature Review.NMC case report journal · 2025Article
- The 2021 World Health Organization Central Nervous System Tumor Classification: The Spectrum of Diffuse Gliomas.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsy guides differential diagnosis of relapsed medulloblastoma versus secondary glioma: A case report of a pediatric patient enrolled on aNeuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we provide a comprehensive clinical and molecular biological characterization of radiation-induced gliomas (RIG), including a risk assessment for developing gliomas. A cohort of 12 patients who developed RIG 9.5 years (3-31 years) after previous cranial radiotherapy for brain tumors or T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia was established. The derived risk of RIG development based on our consecutive cohort of 371 irradiated patients was 1.6% at 10 years and 3.02% at 15 years. Patients with RIG glioma had a dismal prognosis with a median survival of 7.3 months. We described radiology features that might indicate the suspicion of RIG rather than the primary tumor recurrence. Typical molecular features identified by molecular biology examination included the absence of Histon3 mutation, methylation profile of pedHGG-RTK1 and the presence of recurrent PDGFRA amplification and CDKN2A/B deletion. Of the two long-term surviving patients, one had gliomatosis cerebri, and the other had pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma with BRAF V600E mutation. In summary, our experience highlights the need for tissue diagnostics to allow detailed molecular biological characterization of the tumor, differentiation of the secondary tumor from the recurrence of the primary disease and potentially finding a therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.