ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison of accuracy and early outcomes in robotic total knee arthroplasty using NAVIO and ROSA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and the risk of postoperative infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Do image-based robotic TKR systems improve radiological or clinical outcomes compared to image-free systems? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic-Arm-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Cohort Study of Gait and Postural Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Learning curve in image-based robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty: a MAKO-robot experience.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Observational
- Radiographic Accuracy and Consistency of Implant Placement Using the ROSALife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improved alignment and reduced peri-operative blood loss with augmented reality-guided total knee arthroplasty: a single-centre comparative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Applications of robotic technology in orthopaedic surgery: A technology review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Early radiological outcomes of imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with VELYS: a comparative study of CPAK varus vs. valgus phenotypes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The usability of robotic-assisted systems for total knee arthroplasty can be improved without hindering the accuracy of the bone cuts.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- First Clinical Experience with Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Indonesia: Early Results and Comparison with Global Evidence.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2025Article
- High in-vivo accuracy of a novel robotic-arm-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Same same but different-Image-based versus imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty!Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Real-world accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its impact on expedited recovery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the cutting and component placement accuracies and early outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between an image-free handheld robotic system (NAVIO) and a radiography-based robotic system (ROSA). This retrospective study included 88 patients (88 knees) who underwent TKA using the NAVIO (40 patients) or ROSA (48 patients) robotic systems. The accuracies of the robotic systems were compared. Clinical scores were evaluated using the Knee Society Score 2011 (KSS 2011) and the forgotten joint score (FJS)-12 at 1 year postoperatively. The femoral sagittal cutting error was smaller in the NAVIO group than in the ROSA group. The other cutting errors were not statistically different in both groups. Implantation errors did not differ between the groups. Regarding the clinical outcomes of the KSS 2011 subscales, the symptoms score was higher in knees operated using ROSA than in those using NAVIO. The other KSS 2011 subscales and the FJS-12 showed no differences between the two groups. In conclusion, the femoral sagittal cutting error was smaller in the NAVIO group than in the ROSA group, and the KSS 2011 symptom score subsection at one year was higher in the knees operated using ROSA than in those using NAVIO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.