Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38326362›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

Naïve Bayes Classifiers and accompanying dataset for Pseudomonas syringae isolate characterization.

Chad Fautt, Estelle Couradeau, Kevin L Hockett

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chad FauttDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. cwf30@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-9581
Estelle CouradeauDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. efc5279@psu.edu.
Kevin L HockettDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. klh450@psu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pseudomonas syringae species complex (PSSC) is a diverse group of plant pathogens with a collective host range encompassing almost every food crop grown today. As a threat to global food security, rapid detection and characterization of epidemic and emerging pathogenic lineages is essential. However, phylogenetic identification is often complicated by an unclarified and ever-changing taxonomy, making practical use of available databases and the proper training of classifiers difficult. As such, while amplicon sequencing is a common method for routine identification of PSSC isolates, there is no efficient method for accurate classification based on this data. Here we present a suite of five Naïve bayes classifiers for PCR primer sets widely used for PSSC identification, trained on in-silico amplicon data from 2,161 published PSSC genomes using the life identification number (LIN) hierarchical clustering algorithm in place of traditional Linnaean taxonomy. Additionally, we include a dataset for translating classification results back into traditional taxonomic nomenclature (i.e. species, phylogroup, pathovar), and for predicting virulence factor repertoires.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesPseudomonas syringaePhylogenyPlants

Identifiers

PMID38326362
PMCPMC10850129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.