ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Six-Part Classification of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Classification Method to Improve the Diagnosis Rate of Unstable Fractures.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lateral Femoral Neck and Peritrochanteric Fractures: Anatomical Classifications and Pre-Operative Reduction Techniques-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Correlation between anxiety, depression, sense of coherence, and post-traumatic growth in patients who underwent intertrochanteric femoral fracture surgery.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Inter- and Intra-Observer Reliability of the New Comprehensive Classification of Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThree-dimensional (3D)-CT data is currently insufficient for classifying femoral trochanter fractures. Fracture classification based on fracture stability analysis is helpful to evaluate the prognosis of patients after internal fixation. Currently, there is a lack of fracture classification methods based on 3D-CT images and fracture stability analysis. The aim of this study was to propose a new six-part classification method for intertrochanteric fractures of femur based on 3D-CT images and fracture stability analysis to improve the diagnosis rate of unstable fractures.
methodFrom January 2009 to December 2019, 320 patients receiving intramedullary nail surgery for femoral intertrochanteric fractures at Chengdu University's Affiliated Hospital were studied retrospectively. AO and six-part classifications were undertaken according to the 3D-CT image data of the patients, and the stability rates of two classifications were compared. According to the six-part classification stability criteria, the patients were divided into a stable and an unstable fracture group. The perioperative and follow-up indicators of the two groups were statistically analyzed, and the six-part classification's inter-observer and internal reliability was examined.
resultsThere were 107 men and 213 females women the 320 patients, with an average age of 79.32 ± 11.26 years and an osteoporosis rate of 55.63% (178/320). The fracture stability rate of 39.69% (127/320) was studied using a six-part classification method. The AO classification fracture stability rate was 42.50% (136/320), with no significant difference (χ
conclusionThe six-part classification of femoral intertrochanteric fractures based on 3D-CT images has broader guiding relevance for femoral intertrochanteric fracture stability analysis. Clinicians will find this classification simpler and more consistent than the AO classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.