Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38326270›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

VersKiK qualitative study design: actual follow-up needs of paediatric cancer survivors, their informal caregivers and follow-up stakeholder perceptions in Germany.

Ekaterina Aleshchenko, Enno Swart, Mathias Voigt, Thorsten Langer, Gabriele Calaminus, Juliane Glogner, Katja Baust

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ekaterina AleshchenkoMedical Faculty, Institut for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany ekaterina.aleshchenko@med.ovgu.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6338-5014
Enno SwartMedical Faculty, Institut for Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Mathias VoigtInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany.
Thorsten LangerUniversity Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Gabriele CalaminusDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Juliane GlognerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Katja BaustDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article presents the study design of the qualitative part of the VersKiK study (Long-term care, care needs and wellbeing of individuals after cancer in childhood or adolescence: study protocol of a large scale multi-methods non-interventional study) aiming to explore actual follow-up needs of childhood and adolescence cancer survivors and their informal caregivers, gaps in current follow-up care provision and trajectories of cancer survivors' transition from paediatric to adult healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct up to 30 interviews with survivors of childhood and adolescence cancer and their informal caregivers with up to 20 participant observations of follow-up appointments. The results of these will be discussed in up to four focus groups with healthcare professionals and representatives of self-help groups. The study design aims to evaluate follow-up care after childhood cancer considering perspectives from survivors, their informal caregivers as well as healthcare providers. The combination of different data sources will allow us to get an in-depth understanding of the current state of follow-up care after paediatric cancer in Germany and to suggest recommendations for care improvement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The VersKiK study was approved by the Ethics Committee Otto von Guericke University on 2 July 2021 (103/21), by the Ethics Committee of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz on 16 June 2021 (2021-16035), by the Ethics Committee University of Lübeck on 10 November 2021 (21-451), by the Ethics Committee University of Hospital Bonn on 28 February 2022 (05/22). For each part of the qualitative study, a separate written informed consent is prepared and approved accordingly by the ethics committees named above. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered at German Clinical Trial Register, ID: DRKS00026092.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildFollow-Up StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansSurvivorsOrganisation of health servicesPaediatric oncologyPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID38326270
PMCPMC10860087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.