Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38326262›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Reporting and influencing factors of patient-reported outcomes in acupuncture randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional study protocol.

Yuting Duan, Pinge Zhao, Shujuan Liu, Yuening Deng, Zhirui Xu, Linghui Xiong, Zewei Chen, Weifeng Zhu, Shengwei Wu, Lin Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuting DuanSleep Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-0592
Pinge ZhaoKey Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shujuan LiuThe Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuening DengThe Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhirui XuGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Linghui XiongKey Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zewei ChenKey Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weifeng ZhuThe Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shengwei WuKey Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lin YuThe Affiliated TCM Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China yul@gzhmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3924-4569
Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are health reports that come directly from the patients themselves and represented the experience and insights of the patient's perspective on the impact of the intervention. PROs were increasingly emphasised in acupuncture randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, the reporting quality of PROs in acupuncture RCTs has not been investigated to date. Therefore, we constructed this study to reveal the basic characteristics and reporting quality of PROs in acupuncture RCTs, and explore the relationship between concealment, blinding and RROs. We hope our findings can provide guidance for the reporting standards and future development of PROs in acupuncture RCTs in reverse. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RCTs using acupuncture treatment as the intervention and PROs as primary outcomes or secondary outcomes will be systematically searched through seven databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP between 1 January 2012 and 15 October 2022. The basic characteristics, concealment, blinding design and the characteristics of PROs in included RCTs will be summarised. The reporting quality of PROs will be assessed based on the CONSORT PRO extension. Logistic analysis will be performed to identify the association between concealment, blinding and RROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study. This protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed academic journal.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReference StandardsSystematic Reviews as Topiccomplementary medicineobservational studypatient reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID38326262
PMCPMC10860004
OpenAlexW4391649287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.