Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38326260›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Measurement properties of the incremental step test for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.

Tânia Gonçalves, João Carlos Winck, Fátima Silva, Cátia Caneiras, António Mesquita Montes, Rui Vilarinho

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04715659 (A Novel Incremental Step Test as an Alternative for the Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Patients With COPD - The Study of Its Measurement Properties), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04715659 unknown statusnot on this map

A Novel Incremental Step Test as an Alternative for the Assessment of Exercise Capacity in Patients With COPD - The Study of Its Measurement Properties

TypeobservationalSponsorPolytechnic Institute of PortoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsCOPDArmsPerformance of step test (number of steps) for the assessment of exercise capacity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tânia GonçalvesCenter for Rehabilitation Research (CIR), School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
João Carlos WinckDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Fátima SilvaFP-I3ID, Escola Superior de Saúde Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.
Cátia CaneirasMicrobiology Research Laboratory on Environmental Health (EnviHealthMicroLab), Institute of Environmental Health (ISAMB), Associate Laboratory TERRA, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3735-8554
António Mesquita MontesCenter for Rehabilitation Research (CIR), School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rui VilarinhoCenter for Rehabilitation Research (CIR), School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal ruivilarinho1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4422-8440
Fernando Pessoa University · PTHospital de Santa Maria · PTPolytechnic Institute of Porto · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe new incremental step test (IST) is a field test that was developed for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), based on the characteristics of the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT); however, its measurement properties still need to be determined. We aimed, first, to assess the construct validity (through the comparison with the ISWT), within-day reliability and measurement error of the IST in people with COPD; and, second, to identify whether the participants have a learning effect in the IST.

designCross-sectional study, conducted according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments guidelines.

settingA family health unit in Portugal, April 2022 to June 2023. PARTICIPANTS AND ANALYSIS: 63 participants (67.5±10.5 years) attended two sessions to perform two IST and two ISWT, separately. Spearman's correlations were used to compare the best performances between the IST and the ISWT. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC

resultsThe IST was significant and strongly correlated with the ISWT (0.72<ρ<0.74, p<0.001), presented an ICC

conclusionsThe IST can be suggested as a valid and reliable test to assess exercise capacity in people with COPD, with no learning effect when two IST are performed on the same day. The measurement error of the IST is considered indeterminate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04715659.

Indexed as

Exercise TestPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsWalkingWalk TestChronic airways diseaseGERIATRIC MEDICINEREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID38326260
PMCPMC10860116
OpenAlexW4391649522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.