Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38325406›Full record

ReviewUltraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)2024

Noninvasive diagnostic imaging of pelvic venous disorders.

Filip Szkodziak, Slawomir Wozniak, Piotr Robert Szkodziak, Krzysztof Pyra, Tomasz Paszkowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filip Szkodziak3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2138-4694
Slawomir Wozniak3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Piotr Robert Szkodziak3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3582-067X
Krzysztof PyraDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz Paszkowski3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie 329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that chronic pelvic pain (CPP) may affect up to 24% of women. Unfortunately, very often, despite extensive diagnostics, the cause of CPP remains unknown. The pathophysiology of CPP could be explained to a large extent by the occurrence of pelvic venous disorders (PVD). Although pelvic venography is still considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of PVD, noninvasive diagnostic imaging techniques seem to be instrumental in the initial identification of patients with PVD. This literature review aimed to analyze and evaluate the usefulness of noninvasive diagnostic imaging techniques like transvaginal ultrasonography, transabdominal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, and computed tomography in the diagnosis and identification of patients with PVD. Forty-one articles published between 1984 and 2023 were included in this literature review. Based on this literature review, we conclude that the clinical application of noninvasive diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of PVD seems to be very promising. Future studies investigating the role of noninvasive diagnostic imaging techniques in the diagnosis of PVD are required.

Indexed as

Pelvic PainPelvisChronic PainDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhlebographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyVascular Diseases

Identifiers

PMID38325406
PMCPMC11634453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.