Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38325394›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy2024

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: long-term results from a Western cohort.

Ilse N Beaufort, Charlotte N Frederiks, Anouk Overwater, Lodewijk A A Brosens, Arjun D Koch, Roos E Pouw, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Bas L A M Weusten

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk stratification for stricture formation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal dysplasia.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilse N Beaufort *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Charlotte N Frederiks *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7903-1253
Anouk OverwaterDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8356-5776
Lodewijk A A BrosensDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Arjun D KochDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0683-2126
Roos E PouwDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jacques J G H M BergmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bas L A M WeustenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is established as first-choice treatment for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) worldwide, most data are derived from Asian studies. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ESD for patients with early ESCC in a Western cohort.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients with early ESCC amenable to ESD were included from four tertiary referral hospitals in the Netherlands between 2012 and 2017. All ESD procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists, after which the decision for additional treatment was made on a per-patient basis. Outcomes were curative resection rate, ESCC-specific survival, and overall survival.

resultsOf 68 included patients (mean age 69 years; 34 males), ESD was technically successful in 66 (97%; 95%CI 93%-100%), with curative resection achieved in 34/66 (52%; 95%CI 39%-64%). Among patients with noncurative resection, 15/32 (47%) underwent additional treatment, mainly esophagectomy (n = 10) or definitive chemoradiation therapy (n = 4). Endoscopic surveillance was preferred in 17/32 patients (53%), based on severe comorbidities or patient choice. Overall, 31/66 patients (47%) died during a median follow-up of 66 months; 8/31 (26%) were ESCC-related deaths. The 5-year overall and ESCC-specific survival probabilities were 62% (95%CI 52%-75%) and 86% (95%CI 77%-96%), respectively.

conclusionIn this Western cohort with long-term follow-up, the effectiveness and safety of ESD for early ESCC was confirmed, although the rate of noncurative resections was substantial. Irrespective of curative status, the long-term prognosis of these patients was limited mainly due to competing mortality.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overEsophagectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38325394
PMCPMC11582999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.