Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38325363›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2024

Concurrent Clade I and Clade II Monkeypox Virus Circulation, Cameroon, 1979-2022.

Delia D Djuicy, Serge A Sadeuh-Mba, Chanceline N Bilounga, Martial G Yonga, Jules B Tchatchueng-Mbougua, Gael D Essima, Linda Esso, Inès M E Nguidjol, Steve F Metomb, Cornelius Chebo and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Delia D Djuicy
Serge A Sadeuh-Mba
Chanceline N Bilounga
Martial G Yonga
Jules B Tchatchueng-Mbougua
Gael D Essima
Linda Esso
Inès M E Nguidjol
Steve F Metomb
Cornelius Chebo
Samuel M Agwe
Placide A Ankone
Firmin N N Ngonla
Hans M Mossi
Alain G M Etoundi
Sara I Eyangoh
Mirdad Kazanji
Richard Njouom

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During 1979-2022, Cameroon recorded 32 laboratory-confirmed mpox cases among 137 suspected mpox cases identified by the national surveillance network. The highest positivity rate occurred in 2022, indicating potential mpox re-emergence in Cameroon. Both clade I (n = 12) and clade II (n = 18) monkeypox virus (MPXV) were reported, a unique feature of mpox in Cameroon. The overall case-fatality ratio of 2.2% was associated with clade II. We found mpox occurred only in the forested southern part of the country, and MPXV phylogeographic structure revealed a clear geographic separation among concurrent circulating clades. Clade I originated from eastern regions close to neighboring mpox-endemic countries in Central Africa; clade II was prevalent in western regions close to West Africa. Our findings suggest that MPXV re-emerged after a 30-year lapse and might arise from different viral reservoirs unique to ecosystems in eastern and western rainforests of Cameroon.

Indexed as

Monkeypox virusMpox, MonkeypoxAfrica, WesternCameroonEcosystemHumansCameroonCentral Africaclade Iclade IIconcurrent circulationepidemiologyforestgeographic segregationmonkeypox virusMpoxMPXVsurveillancesurveillance systemvirusesWest Africazoonoses

Identifiers

PMID38325363
PMCPMC10902553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.