Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324871›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2024

In vitro susceptibility to fosfomycin in clinical and environmental extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing and/or ciprofloxacin-non-susceptible Escherichia coli isolates.

Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Larissa Bail, Carmen Antonia Sanches Ito, Ana Paula de Andrade, Lavinia Nery Villa Stangler Arend, Paula Hansen Suss, Keite da Silva Nogueira, Haniel Siqueira Mortagua Walflor, Helisson Faoro, Lia Carolina Soares de Medeiros Kuczera and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Victoria Stadler Tasca RibeiroPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas Emergentes, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-3598
Larissa BailPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas Emergentes, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Carmen Antonia Sanches ItoPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas Emergentes, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Ana Paula de AndradePontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas Emergentes, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Lavinia Nery Villa Stangler ArendPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas Emergentes, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Paula Hansen SussPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas Emergentes, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Keite da Silva NogueiraUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Patologia Básica, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Haniel Siqueira Mortagua WalflorFiocruz Paraná, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Laboratório de Ciências e Tecnologias Aplicadas à Saúde, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Helisson FaoroFiocruz Paraná, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Laboratório de Biologia Celular, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-8639
Lia Carolina Soares de Medeiros KuczeraFiocruz Paraná, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Laboratório de Ciências e Tecnologias Aplicadas à Saúde, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Fernando José VicenziLaboratório Municipal de Curitiba, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Felipe Francisco TuonPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Escola de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas Emergentes, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing and ciprofloxacin-non-susceptible Escherichia coli are clinical and environmental issues. We evaluated the susceptibility profile of fosfomycin in non-susceptible E. coli isolated from urine and the environment. We measured the activity of fosfomycin against 319 and 36 E. coli strains from urine and environmental isolates, respectively, collected from rivers. Fosfomycin resistance profiles were investigated using the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that 5% and 6.6% of urine samples were non-susceptible to fosfomycin according to CLSI and EUCAST guidelines, respectively. The fosfomycin MIC50/90 was 0.5/4 mg/L. Of the 36 E. coli isolates from river water, 11.1% and 13,8% were non-susceptible to fosfomycin according to CLSI and EUCAST, respectively (range ≤0.25 ≥512 mg/L). All the isolates with MIC ≥512 mg/L for fosfomycin showed the fosA3 gene. Fosfomycin resistance was more frequent in the environment than in clinical samples.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsFosfomycinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCiprofloxacinEscherichia coliHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCiprofloxacinFosfomycin

Identifiers

PMID38324871
PMCPMC10846478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.