Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324854›Full record

ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2024

IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE EMERGENCY SURGICAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER.

Danilo Toshio Kanno, Roberta Laís Mendonça de Mattos, Rayama Moreira Siqueira, José Aires Pereira, Fábio Guilherme Campos, Carlos Augusto Real Martinez

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danilo Toshio KannoUniversidade São Francisco, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences - Bragança Paulista (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-4017
Roberta Laís Mendonça de MattosUniversidade São Francisco, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences - Bragança Paulista (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-9610
Rayama Moreira SiqueiraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Program in Surgical Sciences - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-8810
José Aires PereiraUniversidade São Francisco, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences - Bragança Paulista (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-7182
Fábio Guilherme CamposUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-6904
Carlos Augusto Real MartinezUniversidade São Francisco, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences - Bragança Paulista (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-427X
Universidade São Francisco · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract and the third most common type of cancer worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic, during the years 2020 and 2022, increased the difficulties in offering adequate early diagnosis and treatment to CRC patients worldwide. During this period, it was only possible to treat patients who evolved with complications, mainly intestinal obstruction and perforation.

aimsTo assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of patients with CRC.

methodsA review of data from a total of 112 patients undergoing emergency surgical treatment due to complications of CRC was carried out. Of these, 78 patients underwent emergency surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020/2021), and 34 were treated before the pandemic (2018/2019). Ethnic aspects, clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, histopathological variables, intra and postoperative complications, and 90-day postoperative follow-up were compared between the two groups.

resultsBetween the years 2018 and 2019, 79.4% (27/34) of patients had intestinal obstruction, while 20.6% (7/34) had intestinal perforation. During the period of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020/2021), 1.3% (1/78) of patients underwent surgery due to gastrointestinal bleeding, 6.4% (5/78) due to intestinal perforation, and 92.3% (72/78) due to intestinal obstruction. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the two groups in ethnic aspects, laboratory tests, type of complications, number of lymph nodes resected, compromised lymph nodes, TNM staging, pre or intraoperative complications, length of stay, readmission, or mortality rate. When considering postoperative tumor staging, among patients operated on in 2018/2019, 44.1% were classified as stage III and 38.2% as stage IV, while during the pandemic period, 28.2% presented stage III and 51.3% stage IV, also without a statistically significant difference between the two periods. Patients operated on during the pandemic had higher rates of vascular, lymphatic and perineural invasion.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic increased the rate of complications related to CRC when comparing patients treated before and during the pandemic. Furthermore, it had a negative impact on histopathological variables, causing worse oncological prognoses in patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCOVID-19Intestinal ObstructionIntestinal PerforationHumansPandemicsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38324854
PMCPMC10841527
OpenAlexW4391534297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.