ArticleBlood advances2024
Flares of acute graft-versus-host disease: a Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium analysis.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autonomous artificial intelligence prescribing a drug to prevent severe acute graft-versus-host disease in HLA-haploidentical transplants.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Systemic steroid treatment of grade I acute GVHD increases steroid-refractory GVHD and NRM.Blood immunology & cellular therapy · 2026Article
- Biomarker-driven strategies and challenges in acute graft-versus-host disease clinical trials.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Differential effects of GVHD therapies on intestinal epithelium.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Novel approaches for separating graft-versus-leukemia effects from graft-versus-host disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Cytokine-Based Predictive Model for Acute GvHD and Composite Outcomes in ATG-Based Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal acute graft versus host disease: a translational perspective from pathogenesis to precision prevention and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Performance of Treatment Response Assessment at Day 7 by Baseline Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Severity.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Article
- The MAGIC composite response: a novel end point integrating clinical and biomarker parameters for acute GVHD.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Refinement of day 28 treatment response criteria for acute GVHD: a collaboration study of the JSTCT and MAGIC.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Prediction and Prognostication of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease by MAGIC Biomarkers.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Serial Clinical and Biomarker Monitoring during Graft-Versus-Host Disease Treatment Identifies Distinct Risk Strata Including an Ultra-Low Risk Group.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Article
- Differences in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Severity and Its Outcomes Between Black and White Patients.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Steroid tapering after GVHD Rx: not too fast, not too slow.Blood advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
36 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe absence of a standardized definition for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) flares and data on its clinical course are significant concerns. We retrospectively evaluated 968 patients across 23 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) transplant centers who achieved complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) within 4 weeks of treatment. The cumulative incidence of flares within 6 months was 22%, and flares were associated with a higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.19-7.36; P < .001). Flares were more severe (grades 3/4, 41% vs 16%; P < .001) and had more frequent lower gastrointestinal (LGI) involvement (55% vs 32%; P < .001) than the initial GVHD. At CR/VGPR, elevated MAGIC biomarkers predicted the future occurrence of a flare, along with its severity and LGI involvement. In multivariate analyses, higher Ann Arbor (AA) biomarker scores at CR/VGPR were significant risk factors for flares (AA2 vs AA1: aHR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.32-2.48; P = .001]; AA3 vs AA1: aHR, 3.14 [95% CI, 1.98-4.98; P < .001]), as were early response to initial treatment (aHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.80; P = .004) and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.00-3.02; P = .049). MAGIC biomarkers also stratified the risk of NRM both at CR/VGPR and at the time of flare. We conclude that GVHD flares are common and carry a significant mortality risk. The occurrence of future flares can be predicted by serum biomarkers that may serve to guide adjustment and discontinuation of immunosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.