ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Quantifying a light-induced energetic change in bacteriorhodopsin by force spectroscopy.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Chain Inherent Elasticity Reveals γ-Irradiation-Induced Backbone Reconstruction in Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride).Macromolecular rapid communications · 2026Article
- Monitoring Membrane Protein Folding Assisted by Insertases and Translocases Using AFM-Based Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy to Probe Intermediates and Energetics of Membrane Protein Folding.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Enzyme Catalytic Parameters and Evolution Across the Dissipation Plane.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Quantifying a light-induced energetic change in bacteriorhodopsin by force spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ligand-induced conformational changes are critical to the function of many membrane proteins and arise from numerous intramolecular interactions. In the photocycle of the model membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin (bR), absorption of a photon by retinal triggers a conformational cascade that results in pumping a proton across the cell membrane. While decades of spectroscopy and structural studies have probed this photocycle in intricate detail, changes in intramolecular energetics that underlie protein motions have remained elusive to experimental quantification. Here, we measured these energetics on the millisecond time scale using atomic-force-microscopy-based single-molecule force spectroscopy. Precisely, timed light pulses triggered the bR photocycle while we measured the equilibrium unfolding and refolding of the terminal 8-amino-acid region of bR's G-helix. These dynamics changed when the EF-helix pair moved ~9 Å away from this end of the G helix during the "open" portion of bR's photocycle. In ~60% of the data, we observed abrupt light-induced destabilization of 3.4 ± 0.3 kcal/mol, lasting 38 ± 3 ms. The kinetics and pH-dependence of this destabilization were consistent with prior measurements of bR's open phase. The frequency of light-induced destabilization increased with the duration of illumination and was dramatically reduced in the triple mutant (D96G/F171C/F219L) thought to trap bR in its open phase. In the other ~40% of the data, photoexcitation unexpectedly stabilized a longer-lived putative misfolded state. Through this work, we establish a general single-molecule force spectroscopy approach for measuring ligand-induced energetics and lifetimes in membrane proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.