Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324512›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Optimized braces for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A study protocol of a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Maxence Coulombe, Aymeric Guy, Soraya Barchi, Hubert Labelle, Carl-Éric Aubin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05001568 (Validation of a New Optimized Nighttime Providence Brace for Personalized Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05001568 naunknown statusnot on this map

Validation of a New Optimized Nighttime Providence Brace for Personalized Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Justine's HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled58ConditionsScoliosis, Idiopathic ScoliosisArmsImmediate in-brace correction: Conventional Brace, Immediate in-brace correction: Optimized Brace, Long-term bracing: Conventional Brace, Long-term bracing: Optimized Brace
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Providence Bracing in Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maxence CoulombeDepartment of Medecine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Aymeric GuyDepartment of Orthopedics, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2514-5631
Soraya BarchiDepartment of Orthopedics, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Hubert LabelleDepartment of Orthopedics, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-4840
Carl-Éric AubinDepartment of Orthopedics, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a 3D deformity of the spine that affects 3% of the adolescent population. Conservative treatments like bracing aim to halt the progression of the curve to the surgical threshold. Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) methods for brace design and manufacturing are becoming increasingly used. Linked to CAD/CAM and 3D radiographic reconstruction techniques, we developed a finite element model (FEM) enabling to simulate the brace effectiveness before its fabrication, as well as a semi-automatic design processes. The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to compare and validate such FEM semi-automatic algorithm used to design nighttime Providence-type braces. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fifty-eight patients with AIS aged between 10 to 16-years and skeletally immature will be recruited. At the delivery stage, all patients will receive both a Providence-type brace optimized by the semi-automatic algorithm leveraging a patient-specific FEM (Test) and a conventional Providence-type brace (Control), both designed using CAD/CAM methods. Biplanar radiographs will be taken for each patient with both braces in a randomized crossover approach to evaluate immediate correction. Patients will then be randomized to keep either the Test or Control brace as prescribed with a renewal if necessary, and will be followed over two years. The primary outcome will be the change in Cobb angle of the main curve after two years. Secondary outcomes will be brace failure rate, quality of life (QoL) and immediate in-brace correction. This is a single-centre study, double-blinded (participant and outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial (RCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05001568.

Indexed as

KyphosisScoliosisAdolescentChildConservative TreatmentHumansRadiographyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38324512
PMCPMC10849249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.