Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324368›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Remote Self-Administration of Cognitive Screeners for Older Adults Prior to a Primary Care Visit: Pilot Cross-Sectional Study of the Reliability and Usability of the MyCog Mobile Screening App.

Stephanie Ruth Young, Elizabeth McManus Dworak, Greg Joseph Byrne, Callie Madison Jones, Lihua Yao, Julia Noelani Yoshino Benavente, Maria Varela Diaz, Laura Curtis, Richard Gershon, Michael Wolf and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephanie Ruth YoungDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8205-9297
Elizabeth McManus DworakDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4589-1663
Greg Joseph ByrneDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-6501
Callie Madison JonesDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2514-7984
Lihua YaoDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3146-5455
Julia Noelani Yoshino BenaventeCenter for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-1809
Maria Varela DiazDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2791-1512
Laura CurtisCenter for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2380-2201
Richard GershonDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-0112
Michael WolfCenter for Applied Health Research on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-6517
Cindy J NowinskiDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5608-909X

Funding

Development and Validation of a Telehealth Strategy for Routine Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: The MyCog Mobile AssessmentR01AG074245 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI NOWINSKI, CINDY J., WOLF, MICHAEL S · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG074245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine cognitive screening is essential in the early detection of dementia, but time constraints in primary care settings often limit clinicians' ability to conduct screenings. MyCog Mobile is a newly developed cognitive screening system that patients can self-administer on their smartphones before a primary care visit, which can help save clinics' time, encourage broader screening practices, and increase early detection of cognitive decline.

objectiveThe goal of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial psychometric properties of MyCog Mobile. Research questions included (1) Can older adults complete MyCog Mobile remotely without staff support? (2) Are the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the measures acceptable? and (3) How do participants rate the user experience of MyCog Mobile?

methodsA sample of adults aged 65 years and older (N=51) self-administered the MyCog Mobile measures remotely on their smartphones twice within a 2- to 3-week interval. The pilot version of MyCog Mobile includes 4 activities: MyFaces measures facial memory, MySorting measures executive functioning, MySequences measures working memory, and MyPictures measures episodic memory. After their first administration, participants also completed a modified version of the Simplified System Usability Scale (S-SUS) and 2 custom survey items.

resultsAll participants in the sample passed the practice items and completed each measure. Findings indicate that the Mobile Toolbox assessments measure the constructs well (internal consistency 0.73 to 0.91) and are stable over an approximately 2-week delay (test-retest reliability 0.61 to 0.71). Participants' rating of the user experience (mean S-SUS score 73.17, SD 19.27) indicated that older adults found the usability of MyCog Mobile to be above average. On free-response feedback items, most participants provided positive feedback or no feedback at all, but some indicated a need for clarity in certain task instructions, concerns about participants' abilities, desire to be able to contact a support person or use in-app technical support, and desire for additional practice items.

conclusionsPilot evidence suggests that the MyCog Mobile cognitive screener can be reliably self-administered by older adults on their smartphones. Participants in our study generally provided positive feedback about the MyCog Mobile experience and rated the usability of the app highly. Based on participant feedback, we will conduct further usability research to improve support functionality, optimize task instructions and practice opportunities, and ensure that patients feel comfortable using MyCog Mobile. The next steps include a clinical validation study that compares MyCog Mobile to gold-standard assessments and tests the sensitivity and specificity of the measures for identifying dementia.

Indexed as

agedageingagingAlzheimer’s disease, Alzheimer'sAlzheimer’s disease and age-related dementiaappapplicationsappscognitioncognitivecognitive screeningdementiadetectionearly detectionelderelderlyfeasibilitygeriatricgeriatricsgerontologymHealth, mobile health appsmobile healthmobile phoneolder adultolder adultsolder peopleolder personpsychometricscreeningsmartphonesmartphonesusabilityuser experience

Identifiers

PMID38324368
PMCPMC10882476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.