Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324364›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Understanding the Acceptability of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for HIV Prevention Among At-Risk Populations and Feasibility Considerations for Product Introduction in India: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.

Joyeeta Mukherjee, Shruta Rawat, Saif Ul Hadi, Pritha Aggarwal, Venkatesan Chakrapani, Pratyasha Rath, Pallavi Manchi, Srikrishnan Aylur, Shelly Malhotra, Margaret Keane and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Joyeeta MukherjeeInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative, Gurugram, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5018-2736
Shruta RawatThe Humsafar Trust, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9248-0272
Saif Ul HadiInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative, Gurugram, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-2145
Pritha AggarwalInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative, Gurugram, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2489-8583
Venkatesan ChakrapaniCentre for Sexuality and Health Research And Policy, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-9135
Pratyasha RathThe Final Mile, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4242-6961
Pallavi ManchiThe Final Mile, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7632-3797
Srikrishnan AylurYeshwant Rao Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0533-6836
Shelly MalhotraInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-386X
Margaret KeaneInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5443-4201
Alok GangaramanyThe Final Mile, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3908-8463
International AIDS Vaccine Initiative · USCentre for Sexuality and Health Research and Policy · INHumsafar Trust · INYR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcceptability and preference research play a crucial role in the design, evaluation, and implementation of any new prevention product in any geographical setting. They also play a critical role in the development of clinical guidelines and policies. A wide range of acceptability studies have been conducted in diverse general and key populations for various new HIV prevention products worldwide. As clinical development strategies are being developed for clinical studies of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) as potential HIV prevention products, appropriately tailoring them to address the type of HIV epidemic at hand would be critical for efficient uptake within in-country public health systems and decrease adoption and adherence challenges. Accomplishing this will require comprehensive acceptability and feasibility studies to inform multisectoral efforts that increase access to these products and national policies supportive of access to health care for those in most need. Thus, it is both opportune and important to undertake focused efforts toward informing product development strategies.

objectiveThis study aims to understand preferences for product attributes and key behavioral factors influencing adoption and uptake of bNAb prevention products among end-users including female sex workers, men who have sex with men, transgender women, people who inject drugs, and adolescent girls and young women in India and understand the key health system and programmatic perspectives toward the introduction of bNAb prevention products from health service providers and policy makers in India.

methodsA multisite study will be conducted in Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai to capture the differences in perspectives among diverse end-users and key informants across the country. The study will use a multimethods design using focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, simulated behavioral experiments, and key informant interviews. A total of 30 focus group discussions, 45 in-depth interviews, 15 simulated behavioral experiments sessions, and 15 key informant interviews will be conducted across 3 sites.

resultsThe data collected and analyzed will enable insights on which specific product attributes matter the most to the populations and why some attributes are less preferred; contextual drivers of preferences and choices at individual, interpersonal, social, and structural levels; and relative positioning of bNAb products among other potential HIV prevention products. Insights from the health service providers and policy makers will provide a critical understanding of the need perception of the potential product in the existing product landscape and what additional efforts and resources are required for potential introduction, delivery, and uptake of the bNAb products in the Indian context.

conclusionsInsights generated from the abovementioned objectives will represent perspectives of populations of interest across geographies in India, will provide an overview of the acceptability of bNAb products and the feasibility of their introduction in this region, and will inform product development strategies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/47700.

Indexed as

acceptabilitybroadly neutralizing antibodiesend-user preferencesfeasibilityHIVkey populationsproduct attributesqualitative studysimulated behavioral experiments

Identifiers

PMID38324364
PMCPMC10882480
OpenAlexW4389690092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.