Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324345›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Multiple Perspectives on the Adoption of SMART Technologies for Improving Care of Older People: Mixed Methods Study.

Steriani Elavsky, Lenka Knapova, Kamil Janiš, Richard Cimler, Jitka Kuhnova, Tomas Cernicky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steriani ElavskyDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5070-0481
Lenka KnapovaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1366-8961
Kamil JanišDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-2289
Richard CimlerAnume Ltd, Hradec Kralové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6712-9894
Jitka KuhnovaFaculty of Science, University of Hradec Karlove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9223-5672
Tomas CernickySeneCura SeniorCentrum HŠH Inc, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0003-6818-5953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the ever-increasing offering of SMART technologies (ie, computer-controlled devices acting intelligently and capable of monitoring, analyzing or reporting), a wide gap exists between the development of new technological innovations and their adoption in everyday care for older adults.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the barriers and concerns related to the adoption of SMART technologies among different groups of stakeholders.

methodsData from 4 sources were used: semistructured in-person or internet-based interviews with professional caregivers (n=12), structured email interviews with experts in the area of aging (n=9), a web-based survey of older adults (>55 years) attending the Virtual University of the Third Age (n=369), and a case study on the adoption of new technology by an older adult care facility.

resultsAlthough all stakeholders noted the potential of SMART technologies to improve older adult care, multiple barriers to their adoption were identified. Caregivers perceived older adults as disinterested or incompetent in using technology, reported preferring known strategies over new technologies, and noted own fears of using technology. Experts viewed technologies as essential but expressed concerns about cost, low digital competency of older adults, and lack of support or willingness to implement technologies in older adult care. Older adults reported few concerns overall, but among the mentioned concerns were lack of ability or interest, misuse of data, and limited usefulness (in specific subgroups or situations). In addition, older adults' ratings of the usefulness of different technologies correlated with their self-rating of digital competency (r=0.258; P<.001).

conclusionsOlder adults appeared to have more positive views of various technologies than professional caregivers; however, their concerns varied by the type of technology. Lack of competence and lack of support were among the common themes, suggesting that educationally oriented programs for both older adults and their caregivers should be pursued.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementTechnologyAgedAgingElectronic MailFearHumansadultscaregiversmobile phoneolderSMARTtechnologicaltechnologies

Identifiers

PMID38324345
PMCPMC10882473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.