Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324185›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024

Female Urethroplasty with a Buccal Mucosa Graft using a Supraurethral Approach.

Tricia Kuo, Murat Uçar, Suresh Venugopal, Nadir I Osman, Richard D Inman, Christopher R Chapple

Abstract readVideo-Audio MediaCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tricia KuoDepartment of Urology, Urohealth Medical Clinic, Singapore, Singapore.
Murat UçarDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey. ucarmurat07@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8690-0485
Suresh VenugopalDepartment of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK.
Nadir I OsmanDepartment of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9946-1629
Richard D InmanDepartment of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6721-5418
Christopher R ChappleDepartment of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2960-9931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisIn the setting of recurrent female urethral stricture, urethroplasty offer the best chance of cure. However, which approach (dorsal or ventral) and which tissue (buccal mucosa, vaginal graft, vaginal flap) remain areas of controversy. In this article and accompanying video, we describe female urethroplasty with a supraurethral approach using a buccal mucosa graft.

methodsA stricture of 3 cm in length was observed in the mid urethra. A supraurethral semi-lunar incision was made and dissection was performed up to the stricture. A dorsal urethrotomy was performed and a 3 × 2 cm oral mucosal graft was harvested from the left cheek. The mucosal graft was anastomosed to both urethral edges with running sutures. The graft was fixed to the supraurethral tissue with quilting sutures. A urethral catheter and a suprapubic catheter were left in place for 3 weeks.

resultsFollowing removal of the catheters, the patient was able to void satisfactorily with no incontinence. No complications were observed in the urethral area or at the graft harvest site.

conclusionsBuccal mucosa graft urethroplasty with a supraurethral approach is a reliable method in the treatment of female urethral stricture.

Indexed as

Mouth MucosaUrethraUrethral StrictureFemaleHumansAutograftsFemale urogenital diseasesMouth mucosaUrethraUrethral strictureUrethroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.