Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324172›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2024

Artificial Intelligence Tools for Improving Manometric Diagnosis of Esophageal Dysmotility.

Ofer Fass, Benjamin D Rogers, C Prakash Gyawali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Future perspectives in esophageal manometry.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ofer FassDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Benjamin D RogersDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. cprakash@wustl.edu.

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN ACADEMIC GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007056 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Natalie J. Torok · 1986 to 2026
$6.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewArtificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term that pertains to a computer's ability to mimic and sometimes surpass human intelligence in interpretation of large datasets. The adoption of AI in gastrointestinal motility has been slower compared to other areas such as polyp detection and interpretation of histopathology. RECENT

findingsWithin esophageal physiologic testing, AI can automate interpretation of image-based tests, especially high resolution manometry (HRM) and functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) studies. Basic tasks such as identification of landmarks, determining adequacy of the HRM study and identification from achalasia from non-achalasia patterns are achieved with good accuracy. However, existing AI systems compare AI interpretation to expert analysis rather than to clinical outcome from management based on AI diagnosis. The use of AI methods is much less advanced within the field of ambulatory reflux monitoring, where challenges exist in assimilation of data from multiple impedance and pH channels. There remains potential for replication of the AI successes within esophageal physiologic testing to HRM of the anorectum, and to innovative and novel methods of evaluating gastric electrical activity and motor function. The use of AI has tremendous potential to improve detection of dysmotility within the esophagus using esophageal physiologic testing, as well as in other regions of the gastrointestinal tract. Eventually, integration of patient presentation, demographics and alternate test results to individual motility test interpretation will improve diagnostic precision and prognostication using AI tools.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Motility DisordersArtificial IntelligenceHumansManometryArtificial intelligenceFunctional lumen imaging probeHigh resolution manometryMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38324172
PMCPMC10960670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.