Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324170›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025

The Lighter Touch: Less-Restriction in Sequentially Implemented Behavioral Sleep Interventions for Children with Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Conditions.

Emma C Woodford, Laurie K McLay, Karyn G France, Neville M Blampied

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma C WoodfordFaculty of Health, Te Kaupeka Oranga, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. emma.woodford@pg.canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9596-8636
Laurie K McLayFaculty of Health, Te Kaupeka Oranga, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-3695
Karyn G FranceFaculty of Health, Te Kaupeka Oranga, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-5390
Neville M BlampiedPsychology Speech & Hearing, Faculty of Science, Te Kaupeka Pūtaiao, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-4904

Funding

Marsden Fund M1211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prevalence of sleep difficulties among children with rare genetic neurodevelopmental conditions (RGNC) is high. Behavioral interventions are commonly used in the treatment of sleep difficulties in children with neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism, however, research is scarce in children with RGNC. The range of co-occurring complexities within this population, means there is a need for research to not only determine the effectiveness of behavioral sleep interventions, but also which components might be the least restrictive (i.e., intensive/aversive) and minimally sufficient.

methodsThis study used a single-case multiple baseline design to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of behavioral sleep interventions, indicated within a Functional Behavior formulation in eight children with RGNC (M = 7.3 years). Intervention components were sequentially administered across up to three phases, based on the principle of less restriction (from least to relatively more intensive) to determine what might be minimally sufficient.

resultsResults showed an improvement in sleep onset latency, night wakings, early morning waking and unwanted bed-sharing for 7/7, 6/7, 3/3 and 3/3 children respectively. Improvement was observed for most participants following the less restrictive phases of intervention (circadian modifications, antecedent modifications and positive reinforcement), however, more restrictive, albeit modified, extinction procedures were still implemented for five participants. Improvements were maintained at follow-up and interventions were deemed acceptable to parents.

conclusionsLess restrictive function-based behavioral strategies are an effective, and in some cases sufficient, contribution to a sequence of interventions for a range of sleep difficulties. They should be implemented first, before more restrictive strategies.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyNeurodevelopmental DisordersSleep Wake DisordersChildFemaleHumansMaleSleepTreatment OutcomeBehavioral interventionsLeast restrictiveNeurodevelopmental disordersRare genetic disordersSleep

Identifiers

PMID38324170
PMCPMC11813967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.