ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Semi-supervised multi-source transfer learning for cross-subject EEG motor imagery classification.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RMETNet: A cross-subject motor imagery EEG signal classification model based on TSLANet and riemannian geometry features.PloS one · 2026Article
- Transfer learning for subject-independent motor imagery EEG classification using convolutional relational networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG) motor imagery (MI) classification refers to the use of EEG signals to identify and classify subjects' motor imagery activities; this task has received increasing attention with the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). However, the collection of EEG data is usually time-consuming and labor-intensive, which makes it difficult to obtain sufficient labeled data from the new subject to train a new model. Moreover, the EEG signals of different individuals exhibit significant differences, leading to a significant drop in the performance of a model trained on the existing subjects when directly classifying EEG signals acquired from new subjects. Therefore, it is crucial to make full use of the EEG data of the existing subjects and the unlabeled EEG data of the new target subject to improve the MI classification performance achieved for the target subject. This research study proposes a semi-supervised multi-source transfer (SSMT) learning model to address the above problems; the model learns informative and domain-invariant representations to address cross-subject MI-EEG classification tasks. In particular, a dynamic transferred weighting schema is presented to obtain the final predictions by integrating the weighted features derived from multi-source domains. The average accuracies achieved on two publicly available EEG datasets reach 83.57
Indexed as
Identifiers
38324109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.