ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Analysis of the Adherent Cell Response to the Substrate Stiffness Using Tensegrity.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Vitro Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study on the Influence of Uniaxial Cyclic Compression on Cytoskeletal Structure.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell's shape is dependent on the cytoskeleton mechanical properties. Hybrid models were developed that combine the discrete structure for the cytoskeleton and continuum parts for other cell organelles. Tensegrity-based structures that consist of tensile and compression elements are useful models to understand the cytoskeleton mechanical behavior. In this study, we are looking to examine the reaction of the cell to a variety of substrate stiffnesses and explain the relationship between cell behavior and substrate mechanical properties. However, which tensegrity structure is appropriate for modeling a living cell? Is the structure's complexity play a major role? We used two spherical tensegrities with different complexities to assess the impact of the structure on the cell's mechanical response versus substrate's stiffness. Six- and twelve-strut tensegrities together with membrane, cytoplasm, nucleoskeleton, and nucleus envelope were assembled in Abaqus package to create a hybrid cell model. A compressive load was applied to the cell model and the reaction forces versus deflection curves were analyzed for number of substrate stiffness values. By analyzing the difference due to two different tensegrities it became clear that the lower density structure is a better choice for modeling stiffer cells. It was also found that the six-strut tensegrity is sensitive to higher range of substrate stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38324074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.