Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324074›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Analysis of the Adherent Cell Response to the Substrate Stiffness Using Tensegrity.

Gholamreza Mohammadi Khounsaraki, Mehdi Movahedi, Hanieh Niroomand Oscuii, Arkady Voloshin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gholamreza Mohammadi KhounsarakiSahand University of Technology, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran.
Mehdi MovahediIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Hanieh Niroomand OscuiiSahand University of Technology, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran.
Arkady VoloshinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 18017, USA. av01@lehigh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-3229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell's shape is dependent on the cytoskeleton mechanical properties. Hybrid models were developed that combine the discrete structure for the cytoskeleton and continuum parts for other cell organelles. Tensegrity-based structures that consist of tensile and compression elements are useful models to understand the cytoskeleton mechanical behavior. In this study, we are looking to examine the reaction of the cell to a variety of substrate stiffnesses and explain the relationship between cell behavior and substrate mechanical properties. However, which tensegrity structure is appropriate for modeling a living cell? Is the structure's complexity play a major role? We used two spherical tensegrities with different complexities to assess the impact of the structure on the cell's mechanical response versus substrate's stiffness. Six- and twelve-strut tensegrities together with membrane, cytoplasm, nucleoskeleton, and nucleus envelope were assembled in Abaqus package to create a hybrid cell model. A compressive load was applied to the cell model and the reaction forces versus deflection curves were analyzed for number of substrate stiffness values. By analyzing the difference due to two different tensegrities it became clear that the lower density structure is a better choice for modeling stiffer cells. It was also found that the six-strut tensegrity is sensitive to higher range of substrate stiffness.

Indexed as

CytoskeletonModels, BiologicalMicrotubulesStress, Mechanical6 and 12 struts spherical tensegrityAdherent cellsCell sensitivityCellular biomechanicsCytoskeletonFEM

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.