Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323823›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2024

Performance of BD Onclarity HPV assay on FLOQSwabs vaginal self-samples.

Marianna Martinelli, Ardashel Latsuzbaia, Jesper Bonde, Helle Pedersen, Anna D Iacobone, Fabio Bottari, Andrea F Piana, Roberto Pietri, Clementina E Cocuzza, Marc Arbyn and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Marianna MartinelliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2273-6986
Ardashel LatsuzbaiaUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7361-3081
Jesper BondeDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Copenhagen University Hospital, AHH-Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Helle PedersenDepartment of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Copenhagen University Hospital, AHH-Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anna D IacobonePreventive Gynecology Unit, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Fabio BottariDivision of Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1838-0163
Andrea F PianaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Roberto PietriU.O. Coordinamento Consultori Familiari, ASSL Sassari - ATS Sardegna, Sassari, Italy.
Clementina E Cocuzza *Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6166-1134
Marc Arbyn *Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7807-5908
Extended Valhudes Study Group
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Sassari · ITATS Sardegna (Italy) · ITCopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITHvidovre Hospital · DKGhent University · BESciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the accuracy of high-risk human papillomavirus testing of BD Onclarity HPV (Onclarity) assay on vaginal self-collected FLOQSwab versus cervical samples to ensure similar accuracy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Testing was performed on two automated platforms, BD Viper LT and BD COR, to evaluate the effect of machine and using two vaginal self-samples to analyze the influence of collection, transport, and freezing-unfreezing on the results. A cervical sample and two self-samples were collected from 300 women. The first collected vaginal and the cervical sample were tested on BD Viper LT, and the second swab was frozen and subsequently tested on both automated systems. Test results on vaginal and cervical specimens were considered the index and comparator, respectively; colposcopy and histology were reference standards. Relative sensitivity for ≥CIN2 on vaginal samples analyzed versus the cervical sample was 1.01 (0.97-1.06), 1.01 (0.97-1.06), and 1.00 (0.95-1.05), for the first, second self-collected sample tested on BD VIPER LT, and second self-collected sample tested on BD COR, respectively. Relative specificity was 0.83 (0.73-0.94), 0.76 (0.67-0.87), and 0.82 (0.73-0.92) using the three different workflows. Cut-off optimization for human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity defined at Ct ≤38.3 for HPV16, ≤ 34.2 for HPV18, and ≤31.5 for all other types showed an increased relative specificity with similar sensitivity. No significant difference was observed between self-samples tested with the two platforms and between first- and second-collected swabs. Onclarity assay on FLOQSwab using both platforms showed similar sensitivity but lower specificity to detect ≥CIN2 compared to cervical samples. By cut-off optimization, non-inferior specificity could be reached. IMPORTANCE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected vaginal samples has been shown to improve women's participation to cervical cancer screening programs, particularly in regions with limited access to health care. Nevertheless, the introduction of self-sampling in cervical cancer screening programs requires prior clinical validation of the HPV assay in combination with a self-sample collection device, including also the laboratory workflow and automation required for high-throughput testing in screening. In this study, the performance of BD Onclarity HPV on FLOQSwab-collected vaginal self-samples has been compared to clinician-taken liquid-based cytology samples, to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using two high-throughput platforms, BD Viper LT and BD COR. The study findings have shown a similar performance of BD Onclarity on testing self-collected samples, confirming the validation of the proposed pre-analytical and analytical protocols for their use in cervical cancer screening programs based on self-collected vaginal samples.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaecervical cancer preventionHPVvaginal self-sampling

Identifiers

PMID38323823
PMCPMC10913526
OpenAlexW4391600262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.