Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323738›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024

How donanemab data address the coverage with evidence development questions.

Eric G Klein, Krista Schroeder, Alette M Wessels, Adam Phipps, Maureen Japha, Traci Schilling, Jennifer A Zimmer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Further data to address the Alzheimer's coverage with evidence development questions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  7. Reduction in hippocampal cholinergic neurostimulating peptide enhances memory impairment in AppAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. How donanemab data address the coverage with evidence development questions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric G KleinGlobal Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Krista SchroederResearch and Development, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Alette M WesselsResearch and Development, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Adam PhippsLilly Value and Access, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Maureen JaphaCorporate Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Traci SchillingGlobal Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Jennifer A ZimmerResearch and Development, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) established a class-based National Coverage Determination (NCD) for monoclonal antibodies directed against amyloid for Alzheimer's disease (AD) with patient access through Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) based on three questions. This review, focused on donanemab, answers each of these CED questions with quality evidence. TRAILBLAZER-ALZ registration trials are presented with supporting literature and real-world data to answer CED questions for donanemab. TRAILBLAZER-ALZ registration trials demonstrated that donanemab significantly slowed cognitive and functional decline in amyloid-positive early symptomatic AD participants, and lowered their risk of disease progression while key safety risks occurred primarily within the first 6 months and then declined. Donanemab meaningfully improved health outcomes with a manageable safety profile in an early symptomatic AD population, representative of Medicare populations across diverse practice settings. The donanemab data provide the necessary level of evidence for CMS to open a reconsideration of their NCD. HIGHLIGHTS: Donanemab meaningfully improved outcomes in trial participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. Comorbidities in trial participants were consistent with the Medicare population. Co-medications in trial participants were consistent with the Medicare population. Risks associated with treatment tended to occur in the first 6 months. Risks of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities were managed with careful observation and magnetic resonance imaging monitoring.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedNoncommunicable DiseasesAgedAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsHumansMedicareUnited StatesAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddonanemabAlzheimer's diseaseamyloid‐related imaging abnormalitiesamyloid‐targeting therapyanti‐amyloid monoclonal antibodybrain hemorrhageCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Servicescerebral edemacognitive and functional declineCoverage with Evidence Developmentdementiadonanemabearly symptomatic Alzheimer's diseasehealth outcomesMedicaremild cognitive impairmentNational Coverage Determinationtau

Identifiers

PMID38323738
PMCPMC11032520
OpenAlexW4391592285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.