SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2024
The information required by people with inflammatory arthritis when taking Methotrexate: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Everyone's different: a qualitative study of patient perspectives on receiving information about methotrexate from rheumatology nurses.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis mixed-methods systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize knowledge of the characteristics, content, and preferred format of information to support people with inflammatory arthritis (IA) to take MTX.
methodsA literature search using MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, GreyEU, Web of Science and Open Dissertation was conducted to identify all studies published from 2000 to December 2022. Included studies detailed factors related to MTX information needs of people aged ≥18 years with IA published in English. The Joanna Briggs Institute Guidelines (JBI) for convergent integrated mixed-methods systematic reviews were followed using validated tools for data extraction and quality. The data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThirteen studies (seven quantitative, two mixed-methods and four qualitative) were included, involving 3425 adults, mainly female n = 2434 (71%), age 20-84 years. An overarching theme of a requirement for person-centred care was developed, with three interlinking themes: (1) accepting the need for treatment with MTX, (2) concerns about taking MTX, and (3) a need for tailored information and support. Limitations of the evidence included the use of heterogeneous outcome measures and instruments for measuring information needs.
conclusionPeople with IA have individual, multifaceted information and support needs about MTX that are often unresolved when a one-size-fits-all approach is used. The findings of this review can inform rheumatology training to support a person-centred approach to identifying and addressing the specific needs and concerns and development of consistent easy-to-understand accessible MTX information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.