Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323652›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2024

Effect of non-linear strain stiffening in eDAH and unjamming.

Xiaofan Xie, Frank Sauer, Steffen Grosser, Jürgen Lippoldt, Enrico Warmt, Amit Das, Dapeng Bi, Thomas Fuhs, Josef A Käs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaofan XieSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany. jkaes@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4842-6134
Frank SauerSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany. jkaes@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2718-6338
Steffen GrosserSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany. jkaes@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6863-9607
Jürgen LippoldtSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany. jkaes@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-2162
Enrico WarmtSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany. jkaes@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3422-2563
Amit DasDepartment of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-3645
Dapeng BiDepartment of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4850-8666
Thomas FuhsSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany. jkaes@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-4284
Josef A KäsSoft Matter Physics Division, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, University of Leipzig, Germany. jkaes@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3158-2480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cell clusters, the prominent factors at play encompass contractility-based enhanced tissue surface tension and cell unjamming transition. The former effect pertains to the boundary effect, while the latter constitutes a bulk effect. Both effects share outcomes of inducing significant elongation in cells. This elongation is so substantial that it surpasses the limits of linear elasticity, thereby giving rise to additional effects. To investigate these effects, we employ atomic force microscopy (AFM) to analyze how the mechanical properties of individual cells change under such considerable elongation. Our selection of cell lines includes MCF-10A, chosen for its pronounced demonstration of the extended differential adhesion hypothesis (eDAH), and MDA-MB-436, selected due to its manifestation of cell unjamming behavior. In the AFM analyses, we observe a common trend in both cases: as elongation increases, both cell lines exhibit strain stiffening. Notably, this effect is more prominent in MCF-10A compared to MDA-MB-436. Subsequently, we employ AFM on a dynamic range of 1-200 Hz to probe the mechanical characteristics of cell spheroids, focusing on both surface and bulk mechanics. Our findings align with the results from single cell investigations. Specifically, MCF-10A cells, characterized by strong contractile tissue tension, exhibit the greatest stiffness on their surface. Conversely, MDA-MB-436 cells, which experience significant elongation, showcase their highest stiffness within the bulk region. Consequently, the concept of single cell strain stiffening emerges as a crucial element in understanding the mechanics of multicellular spheroids (MCSs), even in the case of MDA-MB-436 cells, which are comparatively softer in nature.

Indexed as

Spheroids, CellularCell LineCells, CulturedElasticityMicroscopy, Atomic Force

Identifiers

PMID38323652
PMCPMC10900305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.