Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323515›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of radiology2024

Deep learning for acute rib fracture detection in CT data: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Manel Lopez-Melia, Virginie Magnin, Stéphane Marchand-Maillet, Silke Grabherr

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) diagnosis of rib fractures.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manel Lopez-MeliaUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Geneva 1206, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-5195-2543
Virginie MagninUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Geneva 1206, Switzerland.
Stéphane Marchand-MailletDepartment of Computer Science, Viper Group, University of Geneva, Carouge 1227, Switzerland.
Silke GrabherrUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Geneva 1206, Switzerland.

Funding

Consortium of Swiss Academic Libraries 82918619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review studies on deep learning (DL) models for classification, detection, and segmentation of rib fractures in CT data, to determine their risk of bias (ROB), and to analyse the performance of acute rib fracture detection models.

methodsResearch articles written in English were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in April 2023. A study was only included if a DL model was used to classify, detect, or segment rib fractures, and only if the model was trained with CT data from humans. For the ROB assessment, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used. The performance of acute rib fracture detection models was meta-analysed with forest plots.

resultsA total of 27 studies were selected. About 75% of the studies have ROB by not reporting the patient selection criteria, including control patients or using 5-mm slice thickness CT scans. The sensitivity, precision, and F1-score of the subgroup of low ROB studies were 89.60% (95%CI, 86.31%-92.90%), 84.89% (95%CI, 81.59%-88.18%), and 86.66% (95%CI, 84.62%-88.71%), respectively. The ROB subgroup differences test for the F1-score led to a p-value below 0.1.

conclusionROB in studies mostly stems from an inappropriate patient and data selection. The studies with low ROB have better F1-score in acute rib fracture detection using DL models. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This systematic review will be a reference to the taxonomy of the current status of rib fracture detection with DL models, and upcoming studies will benefit from our data extraction, our ROB assessment, and our meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRib FracturesTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansSensitivity and Specificitycomputed tomographyCTdeep learningrib fracture

Identifiers

PMID38323515
PMCPMC11027249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.