Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323513›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Personalized Antihypertensive Treatment Optimization With Smartphone-Enabled Remote Precision Dosing of Amlodipine During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PERSONAL-CovidBP Trial).

David J Collier, Mike Taylor, Thomas Godec, Julian Shiel, Rebecca James, Yasmin Chowdury, Patrizia Ebano, Vivienne Monk, Mital Patel, Jane Pheby and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04559074 (Personalised Electronic Record Supported Optimisation When Alone for Patients With Hypertension- Pilot Study for Remote Medical Management of Hypertension During the COVID-19 Pandemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04559074 phase4completednot on this map

Personalised Electronic Record Supported Optimisation When Alone for Patients With Hypertension- Pilot Study for Remote Medical Management of Hypertension During the COVID-19 Pandemic

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2020 to 2021Enrolled343ConditionsHypertensionArmsAmlodipine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David J CollierWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0866-4058
Mike TaylorClosed Loop Medicine London UK.ORCID 0009-0007-4705-5702
Thomas GodecWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8119-1352
Julian ShielWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Rebecca JamesWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Yasmin ChowduryWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Patrizia EbanoWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Vivienne MonkWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5933-2438
Mital PatelWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0009-0006-9477-8906
Jane PhebyWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Ruby PhebyWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0009-0008-0812-5146
Amanda FoubisterWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Clovel DavidWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.
Manish SaxenaWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9964-2692
Leanne RichardsonClosed Loop Medicine London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-9613
James SiddleClosed Loop Medicine London UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-4603
Gregor TimlinClosed Loop Medicine London UK.
Paul GoldsmithClosed Loop Medicine London UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-2598
Nicholas DeemingTrialsConnect London UK.
Neil R PoulterImperial College Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6292-997X
Rhian GabeWolfson Institute of Population Health Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0273-3094
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-028X
Mark J CaulfieldWilliam Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9295-3594
Queen Mary University of London · GBImperial College London · GBTaylor Wimpey (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G9521010Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/M009203/1Medical Research Council MC_PC_14089Medical Research Council MR/M009203/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of the PERSONAL-CovidBP (Personalised Electronic Record Supported Optimisation When Alone for Patients With Hypertension: Pilot Study for Remote Medical Management of Hypertension During the COVID-19 Pandemic) trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of smartphone-enabled remote precision dosing of amlodipine to control blood pressure (BP) in participants with primary hypertension during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND

resultsThis was an open-label, remote, dose titration trial using daily home self-monitoring of BP, drug dose, and side effects with linked smartphone app and telemonitoring. Participants aged ≥18 years with uncontrolled hypertension (5-7 day baseline mean ≥135 mm Hg systolic BP or ≥85 mm Hg diastolic BP) received personalized amlodipine dose titration using novel (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 mg) and standard (5 and 10 mg) doses daily over 14 weeks. The primary outcome of the trial was mean change in systolic BP from baseline to end of treatment. A total of 205 participants were enrolled and mean BP fell from 142/87 (systolic BP/diastolic BP) to 131/81 mm Hg (a reduction of 11 (95% CI, 10-12)/7 (95% CI, 6-7) mm Hg,

conclusionsPersonalized dose titration with amlodipine was safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in treating primary hypertension. The majority of participants achieved BP control on novel doses, and with personalization of dose there were no trial discontinuations due to drug intolerance. App-assisted remote clinician dose titration may better balance BP control and adverse effects and help optimize long-term care. REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04559074.

Indexed as

COVID-19HypertensionAdolescentAdultAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureEssential HypertensionHumansPandemicsPilot ProjectsSmartphoneTreatment OutcomeAmlodipineAntihypertensive Agentsamlodipinehome blood pressurehypertensionpersonalized dose titrationremote care

Identifiers

PMID38323513
PMCPMC11010092
OpenAlexW4391604872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.