ArticleProceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data2019
Generalizing Design of Support Measures for Counting Frequent Patterns in Graphs.
Article in Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generalizing Design of Support Measures for Counting Frequent Patterns in Graphs.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frequent subgraph mining (FSM) from graphs is an active subject in computer science research. One major challenge in FSM is the development of support measures, which are basically functions that map a pattern to its frequency count in a database. Current state-of-the-art in this topic features a hypergraph-based framework for modeling pattern occurrences which unifies the two main flavors of support measures: the overlap-graph based maximum independent set measure (MIS) and minimum image/instance based (MNI) measures. For the purpose of exploring the middle ground between these two groups and guiding the development of new support measures, we present general sufficient conditions for designing new support measures in hypergraph framework, which can be applied to MNI and other support measures that are not included in the overlap graph framework. We utilize the sufficient conditions to generalize MNI and minimum-instance measure (MI) for designing user-defined linear-time measures. Furthermore, we show that a maximum independent subedge set (MISS) measure developed from the sufficient conditions can fill the gap between MIS and MI in computation complexity and support count.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.