ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Construction and validation of a clinical prediction model for deep vein thrombosis in patients with digestive system tumors based on a machine learning.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for venous thromboembolism risk stratification in surgical patients: a systematic review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Elevated serum levels of GPX4, NDUFS4, PRDX5, and TXNRD2 as predictive biomarkers for castration resistance in prostate cancer patients: an exploratory study.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for brain injury in pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Simple, Effective and Validated. VTE CASE Risk Assessment Score for Venous Thromboembolism in Metastatic Germ Cell Tumour Patients Before First-Line Chemotherapy.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Commentary: Immune cell infiltration and prognostic index in cervical cancer: insights from metabolism-related differential genes.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Construction of a risk prediction model for postoperative deep vein thrombosis in colorectal cancer patients based on machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study developed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk prediction model based on multiple machine learning methods for patients with digestive system tumors undergoing surgical treatment. Data of 1048 patients with digestive system tumors admitted to Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital (College of Shanxi Medical University) from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and 845 cases were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were divided into a training group (586 patients), and a validation group (259 patients), then feature selection was performed using six models, including Lasso regression, XGBoost, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, and Logistics. Predictive models were subsequently constructed from column-line plots, and the predictive validity of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, precision-recall curves, and decision-curve analysis. In the model comparison, the XGBoost model showed the largest area under the curve (AUC) on the validation set (P < 0.05), demonstrating excellent predictive performance and generalization ability. We selected the common characteristic factors in the six models to further develop the column line plots to assess the DVT risk. The model performed well in clinical validation and effectively differentiated high-risk and low-risk patients. The differences in BMI, procedure time, and D-dimer were statistically significant between patients in the thrombus group and those in the non-thrombus group (P < 0.05). However, the AUC of the Xgboost model was found to be greater than that of the column chart model by the Delong test (P < 0.05). BMI, procedure time, and D-dimer are critical predictors of DVT risk in patients with digestive system tumors. Our model is an adequate assessment tool for DVT risk, which can help improve the prevention and treatment of DVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38323284PMC10839316W4394761383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.