ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Genetic alterations predict poor efficacy, outcomes and resistance to second-line osimertinib treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 10-pathway burden score complements tumor mutational burden for outcome stratification in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genetic heterogeneity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may impact clinical response and outcomes to targeted therapies. In second-line osimertinib treatment for NSCLC, real-world data on genetic biomarkers for treatment efficacy and prognosis remain incomplete. This real-world study involved 68 NSCLC patients receiving first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). All of these patients developed resistance, and 49 of them subsequently underwent second-line osimertinib treatment. A 639-gene DNA panel was employed to assess the impact of molecular alterations on treatment efficacy, clinical outcomes and resistance. The findings showed that the median progression-free survival (PFS) for second-line osimertinib therapy was 13.3 months. Genes alterations such as P21 (RAC1) activated kinase 5 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
38323283PMC10839301What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.