ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Application of neural networks in prenatal diagnosis of atrioventricular septal defect.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is no relevant study on landmarks detection, one of the Convolutional Neural Network algorithms, in the field of fetal echocardiography (FE). This study aimed to explore whether automatic landmarks detection could be used in FE correctly and whether the atrial length (AL) to ventricular length (VL) ratio (AVLR) could be used to diagnose atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) prenatally. Methods: This was an observational study. Two hundred and seventy-eight four-chamber views in end diastole, divided into the normal, AVSD, and differential diagnosis groups, were retrospectively included in this study. Seven landmarks were labeled sequentially by the experts on these images, and all images were divided into the training and test sets for normal, AVSD, and differential diagnosis groups. U-net, MA-net, and Link-net were used as landmark prediction neural networks. The accuracy of the landmark detection, AL, and VL measurements, as well as the prenatal diagnostic effectiveness of AVLR for AVSD, was compared with the expert labeled. Results: U-net, MA-net, and Link-net could detect the landmarks precisely (within the localization error of 0.09 and 0.13 on X and Y axis) and measure AL and VL accurately (the measured pixel distance error of AL and VL were 0.12 and 0.01 separately). AVLR in AVSD was greater than in other groups (P<0.0001), but the statistical difference was not obvious in the complete, partial, and transitional subgroups (P>0.05). The diagnostic effectiveness of AVLR calculated by three models, area under receiver operating characteristic curve could reach 0.992 (0.968-1.000), was consistent with the expert labeled. Conclusions: U-net, Link-net, and MA-net could detect landmarks and make the measurements accurately. AVLR calculated by three neural networks could be used to make the prenatal diagnosis of AVSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.