ReviewmHealth2024
RACares: a conceptual design to guide mHealth relational agent development based on a systematic review.
Review in mHealth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A relational agent (RA) is a digital tool tailored to communicate with users, aiming to establish a sense of social ease and emotional bond, particularly focusing on their health and well-being concerns. A mobile health (mHealth) RA is particularly crafted to communicate with users within their mobile devices. As healthcare becomes increasingly digital, these mHealth RAs can serve as personal health assistants, e.g., guiding users through medical regimens, offering reminders for medication, providing emotional support during health crises, or even aiding in mental well-being exercises. Their accessibility, especially for those in remote areas, can bridge the gap between patients and immediate health assistance, revolutionizing the way healthcare is approached and delivered. Methods: In this paper, our primary focus is introducing a conceptual design for mHealth RAs with the aim of enhanced user engagement, personalized health interventions, consistent support, data collection and monitoring, and enhanced multimodal accessibility. To develop this conceptual design, we employed an inductive approach. This involved conducting a qualitative analysis on data gathered from a systematic literature review of RAs. Consequently, this analysis allowed us to identify a taxonomy of key design features essential for RAs. Results: This paper provides a conceptual design of mHealth RAs which includes five stages: user input receiving stage, input processing stage, data analysis stage, output processing stage, and output generation stage. A stage is a logical assembly of interconnected functionalities (components) that work together to accomplish a certain objective or set of goals. Each stage's outputs are used as inputs in the stages that follow after it. There is also a Data and Personalization Controller for aiding the data analysis stage. The stages are logically arranged one after another as follows: input, process, analysis, and output. Conclusions: The conceptual design aims to create RAs for various mHealth applications, including patient education, mental health counseling, and chronic disease management. This design is crucial in digital health research as it enhances patient-RA interactions, potentially improving health outcomes and experiences in non-life-threatening scenarios where RAs can be an alternative to human healthcare professionals (HCPs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.