Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323127›Full record

ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Austrian farmers perception of new weeds.

Michael Glaser, Franz Essl, Swen Follak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Austrian farmers perception of new weeds.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael GlaserDivision of BioInvasions, Global Change & Macroecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-6150
Franz EsslDivision of BioInvasions, Global Change & Macroecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-2112
Swen FollakInstitute for Sustainable Plant Production, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1788-0572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition of weed floras in Central European fields has shifted creating a novel management issue: new weeds, that is, species that are currently spreading and increasing in impact. In their role as primary decision makers on the ground, farmers' perception of these new weeds plays a pivotal role in collecting information on their occurrence and control. We conducted an online survey to determine if Austrian farmers recognized 15 selected new weed taxa (12 species and 3 genera) from their farm. The 181 surveyed farmers also estimated the required management effort for these species and elicited their current management practices. Additional questions were posed to understand farmers' general perception of changes in the weed flora. We used a generalized linear mixed model to estimate differences in management effort and identify new weeds that merit monitoring and management programs. Two weed genera (

Indexed as

agricultureagroecosystemsclimate changeinvasive alien speciesland usemanagementonline survey

Identifiers

PMID38323127
PMCPMC10840368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.