Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323123›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Arabic websites assessment of irritable bowel syndrome: How trustworthy are they? A cross-sectional study.

Hamzeh M I Abugharbieh, Raneen Bilal Alshareef, Robin Abu Ghazaleh, Afnan W M Jobran, Hazem Al Ashhab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamzeh M I AbugharbiehDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine Al-Quds University Jerusalem Palestine.ORCID 0000-0001-8975-2177
Raneen Bilal AlshareefDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine Al-Quds University Jerusalem Palestine.
Robin Abu GhazalehPalestine-Korea Biotechnology Research Center Palestine Polytechnic University Hebron Palestine.
Afnan W M JobranDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine Al-Quds University Jerusalem Palestine.
Hazem Al AshhabDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine Al-Quds University Jerusalem Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic GI disorder that affects people all over the world. Patients frequently look for information about their ailments online. Despite being widely and easily accessible, online information's quality and readability are under doubt. In this investigation, we assessed the effectiveness and usability of IBS Arabic websites found on significant search engines. Methods: IBS-related search terms in Arabic were entered into two search engines (Google and YouTube), and the first 30 websites per word from Google, and the first 20 websites per word from YouTube were assessed for eligibility. Eligible Google websites were assessed for quality and readability, while YouTube websites were assessed for quality. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN score and the JAMA Benchmark. Readability was assessed using the automatic Arabic readability index (AARI). Associations between quality, readability, types of websites (medical/nonmedical), and video length were analyzed. Results: Conclusion: The majority of websites were of low to fair quality and required a high degree of readability. As a result, we advise (1) healthcare practitioners to offer helpful websites to their patients, and (2) the development of IBS-related websites under the guidance of experts, with the involvement of patients.

Indexed as

ArabicassessmentGoogleirritable bowel syndromewebsitesYouTube

Identifiers

PMID38323123
PMCPMC10845817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.