Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322981›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Cannabidiol for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Demonstrates No Deficits in Patient-Reported Outcomes Versus Placebo: 1-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Michael J Alaia, Zachary I Li, Isabel Chalem, Eoghan T Hurley, Kinjal Vasavada, Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas, Andrew S Rokito, Laith M Jazrawi, Kevin Kaplan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04672252 (The Use of Cannabidiol), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04672252 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

The Use of Cannabidiol (CBD) in Pain Reduction and Opioid Use After Shoulder Arthroscopy; A Double-Blind, Randomized Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNYU Langone HealthRan2020 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsCBD Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT), Placebo ODT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael J AlaiaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Zachary I LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Isabel ChalemDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Eoghan T HurleyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Kinjal VasavadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Guillem Gonzalez-LomasDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew S RokitoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Laith M JazrawiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Kevin KaplanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Jacksonville Orthopaedic Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cannabidiol (CBD) has been shown recently to positively affect patient pain and satisfaction immediately after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). However, it is unclear whether the addition of CBD to a perioperative regimen could affect postoperative outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent ARCR and received buccally absorbed CBD or an identical placebo for early postoperative pain management at 1-year follow-up. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Eligible patients had previously participated in a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded trial that evaluated the analgesic effects of CBD in the immediate postoperative period after ARCR. The experimental group received 25 mg of CBD 3 times/day if <80 kg and 50 mg of CBD 3 times/day if >80 kg for 14 days, with the control group receiving an identical placebo. The following outcomes were assessed at minimum 1-year follow-up: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and patient satisfaction. The rates of achievement of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were compared based on ASES at latest follow-up. Continuous and categorical variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney Results: Follow-up was obtained from 83 of 99 patients (83.8%) who completed the original trial. There were no significant differences between the CBD and control groups with respect to age, sex, body mass index, rate of concomitant procedures, or number of anchors used intraoperatively. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between the CBD and control groups in VAS pain (0.8 vs 1.2, Conclusion: Perioperative use of CBD for pain control among patients undergoing ARCR did not result in any significant deficits in pain, satisfaction, or patient-reported outcomes at 1-year postoperatively compared with a placebo control group. These findings suggest that CBD can be considered in a postoperative multimodal pain management regimen without detrimental effects on outcome. Registration: NCT04672252 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Indexed as

cannabidioloutcomesrandomized controlled trialrotator cuff repairsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38322981
PMCPMC10846110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.