ArticleHeliyon2024
Machine learning based recommendation of agricultural and horticultural crop farming in India under the regime of NPK, soil pH and three climatic variables.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trait-based machine learning modeling of soluble carbohydrate content in Trachyspermum ammi exposed to organic and chemical fertilization and salicylic acid.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- An explainable spatio-temporal deep learning framework for crop yield prediction and recommendation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning for early detection of guava fruit anthracnose and fruit fly infestation.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Agentic AI-driven autonomous decision support system for smart agriculture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A crop recommendation using improved expert-guided constraint aware differential evolution and CatBoost surrogate learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Dynamic SG-SKRDX hybrid framework for precision weather forecasting and crop suitability in the Cauvery Delta.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interpretable deep learning models for independent fertilizer and crop recommendation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Physics-Aware Ensemble Learning for Superior Crop Recommendation in Smart Agriculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing crop recommendation system with supervised machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Incorporating soil information with machine learning for crop recommendation to improve agricultural output.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fertilization for Growth or Feeding the Weeds? A Deep Dive into Nitrogen's Role in Rice Dynamics in Ecuador.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) can make use of agricultural data related to crop yield under varying soil nutrient levels, and climatic fluctuations to suggest appropriate crops or supplementary nutrients to achieve the highest possible production. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of five distinct ML models for a dataset sourced from the Kaggle repository to generate practical recommendations for crop selection or determination of required nutrient(s) in a given site. The datasets contain information on NPK, soil pH, and three climatic variables: temperature, rainfall, and humidity. The models namely Support vector machine, XGBoost, Random forest, KNN, and Decision Tree were trained using yields of individual data sets of 11 agricultural and 10 horticultural crops, as well as combined yield of both agri-horticultural crops. The results strongly suggest to evaluate individual data sets separately for each crop category rather than using combined the data sets of both categories for better predictions. Comparing the five ML models, the XGBoost demonstrated the highest level of accuracy. The precision rates of XGBoost for recommending agricultural crops, horticultural crops, and a combination of both were 99.09 % (AUC 1.0), 99.3 % (AUC 1.0), and 98.51 % (AUC 0.99), respectively. This non-intrusive method for generating crop recommendations in diverse environmental conditions holds the potential to provide valuable insights for the development of a user-friendly AI cloud-based interface. Such an interface would enable rapid decision-making for optimal fertilizer applications and the selection of suitable crops for cultivation at specific sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.