Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322830›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Control of ZnO nanowires growth in flexible perovskite solar cells: A mini-review.

Karthick Sekar, Raphaël Doineau, Sasikumar Mayarambakam, Bruno Schmaltz, Guylaine Poulin-Vittrant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karthick SekarGREMAN UMR 7347, Université de Tours, CNRS, INSA Centre Val de Loire, 37071 Tours, France.
Raphaël DoineauGREMAN UMR 7347, Université de Tours, CNRS, INSA Centre Val de Loire, 37071 Tours, France.
Sasikumar MayarambakamPCM2E EA 6299, Université de Tours, Parc de Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France.
Bruno SchmaltzPCM2E EA 6299, Université de Tours, Parc de Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France.
Guylaine Poulin-VittrantGREMAN UMR 7347, Université de Tours, CNRS, INSA Centre Val de Loire, 37071 Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their excellent properties, Zinc oxide nanowires (ZnO NW) have been attractive and considered as a promising electron-transporting layer (ETL) in flexible Perovskite Solar Cells (FPSCs). Since the first report on ZnO NWs-based FPSCs giving 2.6 % power conversion efficiency (in 2013), great improvements have been made, allowing to reach up to∼15 % nowadays. However, some issues still need to be addressed, especially on flexible substrates, to achieve uniform and well-aligned ZnO NWs via low-cost chemical solution techniques. Several parameters, such as the growing method (time, temperature, precursors concentration), addition of seed layer (thickness, roughness, annealing temperature) and substrate (rigid or flexible), play a crucial role in ZnO NWs properties (i.e., length, diameter, density and aspect ratio). In this review, these parameters allowing to control the properties of ZnO NWs, like the growth techniques, utilization of seed layers and the growing method (time or precursors concentration) have been summarized. Then, a particular focus on the ZnO NW's role in FPSCs as well as the use of these results on the development of ZnO NWs-based FPSCs have been highlighted.

Indexed as

Flexible substrateNanowiresPerovskite solar cellsSeed layerZnO

Identifiers

PMID38322830
PMCPMC10844130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.