Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322810›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

The Impact of a Centralized Plastic Surgery Research Infrastructure on Scholarly Productivity and Output.

Nikhil Sobti, Ben S Rhee, Luke Soliman, Vinay Rao, Daniel Kwan, Albert S Woo, Reena Bhatt, Loree Kalliainen, Karl Breuing, Paul Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nikhil SobtiFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Ben S RheeFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Luke SolimanFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Vinay RaoFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Daniel KwanFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Albert S WooFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Reena BhattFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Loree KalliainenFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Karl BreuingFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.
Paul LiuFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, R.I.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although research and innovation is a key within the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, the impact of team structure, interpersonal dynamics, and/or standardized infrastructure on scholarly output has been infrequently studied. In this work, we present the formation and implementation of a novel plastic surgery research program that aims to unite previously disparate clinical and translational research efforts at our institution to facilitate critical inquiry. From July 2022 to June 2023, our department launched a pilot research program based on three pillars: (1) formalization of a research curriculum (monthly research meetings for agenda setting and discussion for project honing, formal research leadership for meeting facilitation and workflow regulation), (2) development of a centralized database to compile ongoing research (Google Drive repository to house all ongoing research documents, facilitate real-time editing, and provide resources/templates for assisting in the research process), and (3) bolstering of a core research identity built on mentorship and collaboration (more frequent interactions to shift previously siloed faculty-student mentorship into a robust milieu of intercollaboration). During the first year, we saw an increased number of publications and presentations, as well as robust participation and contribution from faculty, residents, and medical students. Future directions will focus on addressing resource limitation, such as project idea availability and funding, to sustain the success and growth of this novel research infrastructure.

Identifiers

PMID38322810
PMCPMC10846765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.