Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322801›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Barriers and enablers to implementing police mental health co-responder programs: A qualitative study using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

O J Fisher, C Donahoo, E Bosley, R du Cloux, S Garner, S Powell, J Pickard, N Grevis-James, M Wyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The intent is good but… exploring barriers and enablers to clinical pathway use in regional Australian Emergency Departments.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

O J FisherHealth Services Research, Wesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-5370
C DonahooImplementation Support, Research and Evaluation Unit, Office of the Medical Director, Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7981-1546
E BosleyImplementation Support, Research and Evaluation Unit, Office of the Medical Director, Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Australia.
R du ClouxState Domestic, Family Violence and Vulnerable Persons Unit, Domestic Family Violence and Vulnerable Persons Command, Queensland Police Service, Brisbane, Australia.
S GarnerOffice of the Medical Director, Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Australia.
S PowellAddiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.
J PickardState Domestic, Family Violence and Vulnerable Persons Unit, Domestic Family Violence and Vulnerable Persons Command, Queensland Police Service, Brisbane, Australia.
N Grevis-JamesState Domestic, Family Violence and Vulnerable Persons Unit, Domestic Family Violence and Vulnerable Persons Command, Queensland Police Service, Brisbane, Australia.
M WyderAddiction and Mental Health Service, Metro South Health, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Police and mental health co-responder programs operate internationally and can be effective in providing timely and appropriate assessment, brief intervention, and referral services for people experiencing mental health crises. However, these models vary greatly, and little is known about how the design and implementation of these programs impacts their effectiveness. Method: This study was a qualitative, post hoc implementation determinant evaluation of mental health co-responder units in Brisbane, Australia, comprising of verbal or written interviews with police and mental health staff with an on-road role in the co-responder units, and their managers. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to identify barriers and enablers to the program's implementation and effectiveness. Results: Participants ( Conclusions: Using an evidence-based implementation science framework enabled identification of a broad range of contextual barriers and enablers to implementation of police mental health co-responder programs. Adapting the program to address these barriers and enablers during the planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation phases increases the likelihood of the service's effectiveness. These findings will inform the spread and scale of the co-responder program across Queensland, and will be relevant to police districts internationally considering implementing a co-responder program.

Indexed as

co-responderemergency servicesfirst responderimplementation sciencemental healthpolicestreet triage

Identifiers

PMID38322801
PMCPMC10775732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.