Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322795›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Convergent validity and responsiveness of The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) among individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord injury.

Mohammad Alavinia, Farnoosh Farahani, Kristin Musselman, Kristina Plourde, Maryam Omidvar, Molly C Verrier, Saina Aliabadi, B Catharine Craven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad AlaviniaThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Farnoosh FarahaniThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristin MusselmanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristina PlourdeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maryam OmidvarThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Molly C VerrierThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Saina AliabadiThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
B Catharine CravenThe KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to (1) describe the use of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) among individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord injury or disease (NT-SCI/D); (2) evaluate the convergent validity of SWAT for use among inpatients with NT-SCI/D; (3) describe SWAT responsiveness; and (4) explore the relationship between hours of walking therapy and SWAT change. Methods: A quality improvement project was conducted at the University Health Network between 2019 and 2022. Participants' demographics and impairments data, rehabilitation length of stay, and FIM scores were obtained from the National Rehabilitation Reporting System. The walking measure data were collected by therapists as part of routine practice. Hours of part- or whole-gait practice were abstracted from medical records. To determine convergent validity, Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between SWAT stages (admission and discharge) and the walking measures. The change in SWAT levels was calculated to determine responsiveness. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated between SWAT change and hours of walking therapy. Results: Among adult NT-SCI/D participants with potential walking capacity (SWAT≥1B), the majority were classified as American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale D (AIS D) at admission. The SWAT category of 1C ( Conclusion: The SWAT has sufficient convergent validity and responsiveness for describing standing and walking recovery and communicating/monitoring rehabilitation progress among patients with NT-SCI/D.

Indexed as

outcome assessmentpsychometric propertiesspinal cord injurieswalkingwalking speed

Identifiers

PMID38322795
PMCPMC10844483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.