Refinement of X-ray and electron diffraction crystal structures using analytical Fourier transforms of Slater-type atomic wavefunctions in

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Multipolar model and Hirshfeld atom refinement of tetraaquabis(hydrogenmaleato)iron(II).Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2025
   Article
2. Code dependence of calculated crystalline electron densities. Possible lessons for quantum crystallography.IUCrJ · 2025
   Article
3. The use of effective core potentials in Hirshfeld atom refinement: making quantum crystallography faster inJournal of applied crystallography · 2025
   Article
4. Improvement of Single-Crystal Structures of Very Heavy Element Compounds by Refining Anomalous Dispersion Parameters.Inorganic chemistry · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as