Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322717›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2024

Fast nanoscale imaging of strain in a multi-segment heterostructured nanowire with 2D Bragg ptychography.

Susanna Hammarberg, Dmitry Dzhigaev, Lucas A B Marçal, Vilgailė Dagytė, Alexander Björling, Magnus T Borgström, Jesper Wallentin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susanna HammarbergSynchrotron Radiation Research and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, Lund 22100, Sweden.
Dmitry DzhigaevSynchrotron Radiation Research and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, Lund 22100, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8398-9480
Lucas A B MarçalSynchrotron Radiation Research and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, Lund 22100, Sweden.
Vilgailė DagytėSolid State Physics and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, Lund 22100, Sweden.
Alexander BjörlingMAX IV Laboratory, Lund University, Lund 22100, Sweden.
Magnus T BorgströmSolid State Physics and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, Lund 22100, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-0746
Jesper WallentinSynchrotron Radiation Research and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, Lund 22100, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-0483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing semiconductor devices requires a fast and reliable source of strain information with high spatial resolution and strain sensitivity. This work investigates the strain in an axially heterostructured 180 nm-diameter GaInP nanowire with InP segments of varying lengths down to 9 nm, simultaneously probing both materials. Scanning X-ray diffraction (XRD) is compared with Bragg projection ptychography (BPP), a fast single-projection method. BPP offers a sufficient spatial resolution to reveal fine details within the largest segments, unlike scanning XRD. The spatial resolution affects the quantitative accuracy of the strain maps, where BPP shows much-improved agreement with an elastic 3D finite element model compared with scanning XRD. The sensitivity of BPP to small deviations from the Bragg condition is systematically investigated. The experimental confirmation of the model suggests that the large lattice mismatch of 1.52% is accommodated without defects.

Indexed as

Bragg projection ptychographyIII–V materialsnanowiresX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID38322717
PMCPMC10840305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.