Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322665›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2024

Risk Factors for Distant Metastasis in T3 T4 Rectal Cancer.

Cui Tang, Jinming Xu, Moubin Lin, Shixiong Qiu, Huan Wang, Xiaoming Zuo, Mengxiao Liu, Peijun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cui TangDepartment of Radiology, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jinming XuDepartment of Radiology, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Moubin LinDepartment of General Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shixiong QiuDepartment of Radiology, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Huan WangDepartment of Clinical Research Center, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoming ZuoDepartment of Pathology, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Mengxiao LiuMR Scientific Marketing, Diagnostic Imaging, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Peijun WangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1034-9148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Distant metastasis is the leading cause of death in patients with rectal cancer. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the risk factors of distant metastasis in T3 T4 rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), pathological features, and serum indicators. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 146 cases of T3 T4 rectal cancer after radical resection from January 2015 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and postoperative follow-up data of all cases were collected to screen for distant metastatic lesions. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression methods were used to analyze the relationship between MRI features, pathological results, serum test indexes, and distant metastasis. Results: Of the 146 included patients, synchronous or metachronous distance metastasis was confirmed in 43 (29.4%) cases. The patients' baseline data and univariate analysis showed that mrEMVI, maximum tumor diameter, mr T Stage, pathological N stage, number of lymph node metastasis, cancer nodules, preoperative serum CEA, (Carcinoembryonic antigen) and CA199 were associated with distant metastasis. In the multiple logistic regression model, mrEMVI, pathological N stage, number of lymph node metastasis, maximum tumor diameter, and preoperative serum CEA were identified as independent risk factors for distant metastasis: mrEMVI [odds ratio (OR) = 3.06], pathological N stage (OR = 6.52 for N1 vs N0; OR = 63.47 for N2 vs N0), preoperative serum CEA (OR = 0.27), tumor maximum diameter (OR = 1.03), number of lymph nodes metastasis (OR = 0.62). And, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the curve was calculated (area under the curve [AUC) = 0.817, 95% CI = 0.744-0.890, Conclusions: mrEMVI, pathological N stage, number of lymph node metastasis, maximum tumor diameter and preoperative serum CEA are the independent risk factors for distant metastasis in T3 T4 rectal cancer. A comprehensive analysis of the risk factors for distant metastasis in rectal cancer can provide a reliable basis for formulating individualized treatment strategies, follow-up plans, and evaluating prognosis.

Indexed as

CEAdistant metastasisextramural vascular invasionRectal cancerrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38322665
PMCPMC10845996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.