Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38322652›Full record

ReviewThe South African journal of physiotherapy2024

Bilateral versus unilateral upper limb training in (sub)acute stroke: A systematic and meta-analysis.

Justine Dembele, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, Lisa Elogni Renaud Amanzonwé, Oyéné Kossi, Annemie Spooren

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07164612 (The Effectiveness of Occupation-based Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Functions and Activity Participation Among Stroke Survivors During Inpatient Rehabilitation. A Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07164612 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Occupation-based Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Functions and Activity Participation Among Stroke Survivors During Inpatient Rehabilitation. A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamad Medical CorporationRan2025 to 2027Enrolled150ConditionsStrokeArmsOccupation-Based Bilateral Upper Limb Training (OBBT), Conventional therapy group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justine DembeleREVAL, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-2920
Lisa Tedesco TriccasREVAL, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9097-9352
Lisa Elogni Renaud AmanzonwéREVAL, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-8774
Oyéné KossiREVAL, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-7191
Annemie SpoorenREVAL, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-1349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Integrating high dosage bilateral movements to improve upper limb (UL) recovery after stroke is a rehabilitation strategy that could potentially improve bimanual activities. Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of bilateral with unilateral UL training on upper limb impairments and functional independence in (sub)acute stroke. Method: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, ScienceDirect, Web of Science) were systematically searched from inception to June 2023. Randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of bilateral training to unilateral training in stroke survivors (< 6 months poststroke) were included. The treatment effect was computed by the standard mean differences (SMDs). Results: The review included 14 studies involving 706 participants. Bilateral training yielded a significant improvement on UL impairments measured by FMA-UE compared to unilateral training (SMD = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.88; Conclusion: Bilateral UL training was superior to unilateral training in improving impairments measured by FMA-UE and functional independence in daily activities measured by Functional Independence Measure in (sub)acute stroke. Clinical implications: Bilateral upper limb training promotes recovery of impairments and daily activities in (sub)acute phase of stroke.

Indexed as

bilateral trainingfunctionsrehabilitation(sub)acute strokeupper limb

Identifiers

PMID38322652
PMCPMC10839221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.